Test/review of Zanflare C4

vulpes · 2018-02-07T17:00:22.000Z

Does anyone have any codes for this? Those that I could find ($19 on GB) are long dead.

kuoh · 2018-02-07T17:50:58.000Z

While you may have received a very good sample or are extremely consistent with cell placement, I think it’s a bit much to expect that level of precision given the price point. Even a 100mah difference in capacity is only around 3% to 5% variation for a 3000+ mAh cell which I think is pretty darn good and consistent with other analyzers in the same price range.

KuoH

ferongr:

You should RMA it, my C4 is very consistent down to less than 10mAh.

ferongr · 2018-02-07T17:58:36.000Z

If the capacity measurement changed significantly between reinsertions, the loss on the contacts would be so great that would lead to localized heating. It would also lead to incorrect charging voltage, since the voltage drop would affect the CV phase. The issue with reinserstion in most 2 contact analyzers is with internal resistance measurements.

FWIW the $8 Opus BT-C100 I have is similarly consistent in current measurements (not in IR though). Since I also mostly charge pairs of married cells of 18650s from my electronic cigarettes, if inconsistent contact affected capacity measurements it would show. Since both cells are within 15mAh though, it appears you are incorrect.

kuoh · 2018-02-07T18:54:39.000Z

For 100mah over a period of hours to perform testing, localized heating at the contacts would not be very significant. As for your measurements always being within 10’s of mAh, good for you. However if we all expected this level of precision and returned all units not meeting this criteria, there would be few analyzer chargers in the $10-$25 range like we see today.

I also have a c100, 2x c3100, 2x li 500, Zansflare c4 and a few others I can’t remember right now. Yes occasionally I can get readings that are quite close, but I’m not expecting 0.2% precision. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mind if it’s better and certainly don’t want it to be 10% off, but I understand consumer level products are designed to certain price points and set my expectations accordingly.

KuoH

ferongr:

If the capacity measurement changed significantly between reinsertions, the loss on the contacts would be so great that would lead to localized heating.

ferongr · 2018-02-07T19:04:38.000Z

I charge a pair of batteries every day. If there was that much of a difference between capacity merasurements every time it would be obvious. I’m sorry but with two analyzing chargers and a variety of 18650s (Samsung 25Rs, Samsung 30Qs, LG HG2s) I have not encountered such great variations.

Agro · 2018-02-08T23:08:01.000Z

OK, it seems I found the reason for varying measurements.
Temperature swings. When I’m not home heating doesn’t work and temperature goes down by a couple of degrees. I didn’t expect this would be a problem as the cells being measured would be very warm after I return despite quite low ambient temps.
But I took the charger to my fiancee, she measured the 18650B 3 times within 30 mAh. Above 3500 mAh. So I can disregard all the measurements I did so far, but it doesn’t mean there’s a problem with the charger.

The resistance variability is not temperature dependent though…

Agro · 2018-02-22T21:56:10.000Z

A followup…now I get good consistency, but unrealistically high results. 18650GA doing nearly 3700 mAh?

Agro · 2018-03-14T13:05:55.000Z

I got independent confirmation: my C4 measures at least 10% too high compared to Lii-500. That’s after taking into account different termination voltages.

Does anyone know if I can still ask Gearbest for refund / replace long after I actually received the charger?

Also, I can’t help but wonder how many faulty C4s are there in the wild….was it a problematic batch or a single charger?

LichtAn · 2018-03-24T18:16:56.000Z

Anyone got an idea how to modify the charger to get 21700 cells in it? I really love the charger, but it’s just 0.1-0.2mm too short for these cells.

Agro · 2018-05-31T08:54:34.000Z

I wanted to add here that another BLFer got a C4 which measures too high:

Dolidada cells with low capacity and an inaccurate Zanflare C4 Rechargeable Batteries

Dear all, I recently bought a couple of 26650 cells branded with “Dolidada” at this store on Aliexpress. According to the specs on the seller’s webpage this cell should have a capacity of at least 5.500mAh with a discharge current of 20A. Usually, these cells were rewrapped high current Keeppower cells with up to 6.000mAh. Apparently, I was unlucky to get cells from another batch with different specs underneath the shrink. I ran a C-D-C test with 0,5A of discharge current. The picture indicate…

Lux-Perpetua · 2018-05-31T09:36:23.000Z

ferongr:

For 500mA discharge current it shouldn’t matter, the connection resistance generates negligible amounts of voltage drop at this current. 100mAh discrepancies on the discharge test are a fault and not a design issue. While 4 contacts are ideal for IR measurement, this should have no bearing on the issue the previous poster encounters, that is, completely inconsistent capacity measurements and IR readings. My own C4 operates to spec and Henrik’s review shows that IR measurement is consistent between reinsertions.

I have tested my C4 with different brand new cells so far (protected Imalent 18650, protected Acebeam 18650, unprotected Samsung 30Qs, 35Es). Everytime I get significantly higher values on slot #2 than on the other three slots. I also have unrealistic higher capacity values. (Note: The green one left is a Sony VTC5A with only 2.600mAh nominal capacity)

I would be interested if the charger is just measuring wrong or if it really pushes more capacity into the cells which I guess is not possible. But I’d like to be sure. However, I’m going to contact Gearbest to find out what they think about it. To my mind, the analyzation feature of the C4 is crap if I always get wrong values. Even if Gearbest accepted an RMA I’d probably receive just another inaccurate charger in return.

See more here:

Dolidada cells with low capacity and an inaccurate Zanflare C4 Rechargeable Batteries

Guys…thanks a lot for your help! I’m afraid things are now even more complicated than originally expected… Yesterday, I did an additional NOR test (C-D-C cycle) on three Samsung 35E and one Sony VTC5A…all of them are flat tops. The 35E has a nominal capacity of 3.500mAh, the VTC5A has 2.600mAh. Now, if you have a look onto the picture below it becomes clear that the Zanflare C4 is “a bit high” on all cells I have charged so far. The charger was in stage 3 of the C-D-C cycle when I took the pict…

Lux-Perpetua · 2018-06-15T11:52:39.000Z

Sorry for double-posting but I thought it might be interesting to know, what Gearbest replied in terms of those high deviations/wrong numbers when doing a NOR test with the Zanflare C4.

I wrote an honest review about the Zanflare C4 on Gearbest’s website. After that, their customer service team contacted me in order to solve the issues I have with my device. I explained in detail about the high deviations concerning the capacity measurement incl. the fact that charging slot #2 always indicates much more than the other slots.

So…eventually, this is what Gearbest calls “problem solution”. Thank you very much! :person_facepalming:

———————————————————————-
Dear Thomas，

Thank you for your patiencer.

This charger comes with a volume detection function. Voltage accuracy deviation 2; Current accuracy deviation 5; Time accuracy deviation 1. The capacity is tested by charging voltage, current, and time calculations. Due to the fact that it is not a special compartment, the current market can only achieve a 10 accuracy deviation.

The use of interference Including factors: such as the ambient temperature, humidity, battery type, if the battery installed contacts are good or not and so on. For example, if use different brands of the sub-capacity tester to test, there will be some deviations.

Thank you for your understanding.

Best Regards
*
Gearbest Customer Service
http://www.gearbest.com/

HKJ · 2018-06-15T11:55:57.000Z

FlashTom:

This charger comes with a volume detection function. Voltage accuracy deviation 2; Current accuracy deviation 5; Time accuracy deviation 1. The capacity is tested by charging voltage, current, and time calculations. Due to the fact that it is not a special compartment, the current market can only achieve a 10 accuracy deviation.

That sounds very reasonable, with one exception: LiIon charge voltage must be within 1%, I would expect the voltmeter to have same precision.

Lux-Perpetua · 2018-06-15T12:07:20.000Z

HKJ:

FlashTom:

This charger comes with a volume detection function. Voltage accuracy deviation 2; Current accuracy deviation 5; Time accuracy deviation 1. The capacity is tested by charging voltage, current, and time calculations. Due to the fact that it is not a special compartment, the current market can only achieve a 10 accuracy deviation.

That sounds very reasonable, with one exception: LiIon charge voltage must be within 1%, I would expect the voltmeter to have same precision.

So, it’s reasonable to always have 6-10% more capacity indicated than actually is in the battery? And it’s reasonable that the same slot always indicates another 75-125mAh of more capacity compared to the other ones? I know I’m right in the beginning of my learning curve but I feel it hard to believe that this kind of accuracy is useful for measuring cell capacities nor can this charger be used to find adequate pairs of cells to use them in serial connection (e.g. 4s in the new Haikelite MT07S).

Do you still think the Zanflare C4 is a “good” charger?

Speed4goal · 2018-06-15T12:13:39.000Z

If you can get a IMAXb6 hobby charger. Unless you have equipment like hkj there’s always going to be some error. But 300 and 400 more mah on 30q just isn’t acceptable it’s like all your parts in that zanflare are at the worst of their tolerances all combined. With a cheap 30 to 50 dollar charger it will be off by up to 10% between my opus and my IMAX there’s never more then 100mah difference Max. Usually closer. The voltage meter on my opus is low by. .07 so it discharges to 2.73 and charges to 4.13 and I’m fine with this. I’d rather charge my batteries to 4.13 helps with cycle life and only a tiny amount of capacity missing.

Don’t expect much help from gearbest. Their customer service is either great or it’s horrible. More of the latter. The rep on here can help usually. But they’ve told you it’s within spec. I’d use my skyrc charger instead it should give you more accurate discharge values.

pennzy · 2018-06-15T12:14:07.000Z

[/quote]

That sounds very reasonable, with one exception: LiIon charge voltage must be within 1%, I would expect the voltmeter to have same precision.
[/quote]

I have 2 Joinrun S4 chargers. One ends at 4.1V and the other 4.15V . Is this acceptable or should they be closer to 4.2V?

HKJ · 2018-06-15T13:10:35.000Z

FlashTom:

So, it’s reasonable to always have 6-10% more capacity indicated than actually is in the battery? And it’s reasonable that the same slot always indicates another 75-125mAh of more capacity compared to the other ones? I know I’m right in the beginning of my learning curve but I feel it hard to believe that this kind of accuracy is useful for measuring cell capacities nor can this charger be used to find adequate pairs of cells to use them in serial connection (e.g. 4s in the new Haikelite MT07S).

Do you still think the Zanflare C4 is a “good” charger?

Standard chargers are not precision equipment and 125mAh is not that big a difference (Less than 5%)

As I said above, I do not like the 2% tolerance on voltage, but except for that I do not see any reason why it is not a good charger.

HKJ · 2018-06-15T12:19:59.000Z

pennzy:

I have 2 Joinrun S4 chargers. One ends at 4.1V and the other 4.15V . Is this acceptable or should they be closer to 4.2V?

You probably measure after the charger has terminated, this makes it impossible to say if it is within tolerances, but it might very well be.

Try checking these two articles:

https://lygte-info.dk/info/BatteryCharge4.2V%20UK.html
https://lygte-info.dk/info/batteryChargeTerminationTest%20UK.html

Zulumoose · 2018-06-15T12:28:49.000Z

Doesn’t sound reasonable to me. The figures don’t add up.

If you take their figures as accurate and assume absolute worst case to create an overestimate of capacity, the following should happen, unless I am misunderstanding something.

1) Voltage is out by 2, but that doesn’t really matter, since it will be out by the same amount at low and high, where there is very little capacity anyway, so if it terminates charge at 4.2 + 2 that is 4.284V, but it will have started charging at a 2% higher voltage as well, so the extra charge pumped in to reach that extra 0.084V was already present when it started charging at too high a cutoff, so nothing like 2% difference there.

2) Current accuracy 5, ok, so you lose up to 5 accuracy there, no getting around that.

3) Time accuracy 1% so that simply adds 1% to the error, assuming the deviation is in the same direction, ie counting the time too fast, and recording the current too high.

SO 6% is the final figure, since the voltage measurement should affect the start and finish to a similar degree, negating the effect.

6% added to 3000mAh is only 3180, your least inaccurate 30Q holding bay is recording a 22% deviation from 3000. Not acceptable at all.

Lux-Perpetua · 2018-06-15T12:34:42.000Z

Zulumoose:

Doesn’t sound reasonable to me. The figures don’t add up.

If you take their figures as accurate and assume absolute worst case to create an overestimate of capacity, the following should happen, unless I am misunderstanding something.

1) Voltage is out by 2, but that doesn’t really matter, since it will be out by the same amount at low and high, where there is very little capacity anyway, so if it terminates charge at 4.2 + 2 that is 4.284V, but it will have started charging at a 2% higher voltage as well, so the extra charge pumped in to reach that extra 0.084V was already present when it started charging at too high a cutoff, so nothing like 2% difference there.

2) Current accuracy 5, ok, so you lose up to 5 accuracy there, no getting around that.

3) Time accuracy 1% so that simply adds 1% to the error, assuming the deviation is in the same direction, ie counting the time too fast, and recording the current too high.

SO 6% is the final figure, since the voltage measurement should affect the start and finish to a similar degree, negating the effect.

6% added to 3000mAh is only 3180, your least inaccurate 30Q holding bay is recording a 22% deviation from 3000. Not acceptable at all.

If you refer to my picture with one green VTC5A in bay 1 and those purple ones in bay 2-4…well, these are Samsung 35E (nominal capacity 3.500mAh). But still, there are high deviations. So far, I still don’t get it, that bay/slot 2 always measures even more capacity, regardless what cells I put in.