Let’s just say that I’m good friends with SkyNet. 
1 Thank
Eep!
This makes Proxy Blue look like a car2n character.
Resistance is futile?
He will have to get in line behind Homer Simpson:
This is a better glimpse (about 22 minutes) of what channel 1 AI generated news is going to be. As they point out they’re going to rely on “trusted news sources”. They don’t say who determines what trusted news sources are or why. Some of the stories do come from other news outlets without being altered. So if you sprinkle in a little bit of reality you gain some credibility.
It is very interesting to watch this demo but I would not turn to it on a regular basis. Right now they claim it’s going to be available on an app. I did not research to see if there is a fee. They are always going to be late with the news having to rely on other sources. They do claim there will be human editors and fact checkers for whatever that’s worth. So it’s not really AI run amok.
Okay so teach us something. Explain exactly how you requested or told it or asked it to generate that content. Assuming you highlighted my comments, what exactly did you ask or tell it to do to generate what it generated. For both responses.
Edit.
As for missing something. While I did not know that I was responding to AI generated content, I was not buying any of what it was selling. And if it wasn’t for the recent “rude” thread and the rules here I would have called BS without shortening it and using the letters BS. And that’s BS for both responses in full not just parts of them. So you missed my actual feelings and thoughts on the conversation.
But I do want to learn. Please tell us how you got that content.
…hhnnnggĝrrr… i must … resist … posting … nnnngbaaah
You didn’t see Saving Private Ryan? The German POW was trying to endear his American captors at one point by citing all sorts of American entertainment trivia. At one point he says “Steamboat Willie. Toot, toot!”
1 Thank
The trouble is, AI will often be wrong or misleading… if there’s no human editing applied with relevant domain knowledge. Quite literally, AI can arm a whole bunch of wannabe influencers having weak or scant domain knowledge on an item reviewed, to rapidly produce mediocre content that generates ad revenue. It seems like that has already begun. And AI facilitators are facing lawsuits as what they produce is often material scraped from copyrighted content. On the surface, they have some immunity if reviews are not behind paywalls. But if they’re generating ad revenue, then… it becomes a sketchy proposition.
1 Thank
Open up Microsoft Edge. They have AI built into it now. You can open up a panel and ask questions. What Jeff did was probably along the lines of “Write me a detailed review of the Wurkkos TS10 flashlight,” and probably embellished with some additional criteria. That’s one of the new “disciplines” around AI utilization – coming up with request parameters that are sufficiently tailored and comprehensive so as to coax AI into giving you the most desirable output.
Echoes of Ananova from some ~20 years ago.
Could feed it the likes of AP and Reuters stories - whatever you think of those sources there are worse out there … far worse.
I saw it once, ages ago, but don’t really remember that much.
Ya that’s pretty much it. How did you know? Lol
Im not teaching anything that was the AI talking. But sure, it’s stores recent conversations. Here is exactly what I asked it
1 Thank
I asked Bing’s AI to address the issue of climate instability caused by human pollution, enough to even melt the permafrost layer, and what measures we could take to curtail it. Pretty intelligent write-up. Everything checks out. Unfortunately, not nearly enough is being done, or quickly enough. We’re all frogs in a pot of water that’s approaching boiling and yet most of us are saying something equivalent to “yeah, it’s warmer, but it’s kinda like a hot tub. nice, isn’t it?”
Bing
Human pollution is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach to address. Here are some possible solutions that could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and slow down the melting of permafrost:
-
Reduce energy consumption: By reducing energy consumption, we can reduce the amount of fossil fuels burned, which in turn reduces greenhouse gas emissions. This can be achieved by using energy-efficient appliances, turning off lights when not in use, and using public transportation or carpooling instead of driving alone.
-
Promote renewable energy: Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power generate electricity without producing greenhouse gases. Governments and businesses can promote the use of renewable energy by offering incentives and subsidies to individuals and companies that invest in these technologies.
-
Plant more trees: Trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it in their biomass. Planting more trees can help reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and slow down the rate of global warming.
-
Reduce waste: Landfills are a significant source of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. By reducing waste and recycling more, we can reduce the amount of methane produced by landfills.
-
Support climate-friendly policies: Governments can implement policies that promote climate-friendly practices, such as carbon taxes, cap-and-trade systems, and regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.
These are just a few examples of the many possible solutions to human pollution. It’s important to remember that addressing this issue will require a collective effort from individuals, businesses, and governments around the world. Together, we can work towards a cleaner, healthier planet for future generations. 
.
Source(s)
1 Thank