looks bad, taste of the wild has a tall bar of sick reports (but the actual number is tiny)

also looks bad for taste wild, they use peas and sweet potatoes

of course all those charts might be showing, is that owners who go out of their way to find special food for their pet, also go out of their way to report when one of their pets gets sick

since we dont know the number of pets that actually use taste of the wild, for example,
we dont know if the small number of cases is a small percentage of a large population that buys tasteof the wild

all we know from those charts is a few animals got reported as sick, and they were being fed what the owners believed was good food

so, did the food make the pet sick? cant say, not enough info to determine if its simply a matter of thousands of healthy pets and a handful of sick ones

until we know the percent of the population, the mentioned foods may be showing up simply because they have large market share

same with the peas and potatoes
a loving owner chooses grain free, and then reports when their pet gets sick

but think about it… were seeing numbers like 50 sick dogs that ate sweet potatoes, grain free

50 dogs out of how many, 100, 1000, 10,000?

the data sample may a very small percentage of the total population, and the reports may be coming from a very small percentage of owners. Most of the owners are reporting nothing, but they are not mentioned in the charts…

.
.
I bet I could do a study and get tall bars for left handed people that drink water (most do, lol)… But we all know it would be silly to conclude that drinking water causes some people to be left handed

same with taste of the wild
it has sweet potatoes, and some animals who got sick, used that brand
meaningful? Scientific?.. maybe, maybe not… depends how many Not Sick animals there are, so we know what percent is the sick portion… it looks tiny to me… I dont think its good science

.
.
for all I know were just seeing some Trumped up Alternative Facts and fear mongering…