Yes older than 2 years
17% (5 votes)
No
47% (14 votes)
Yes all of em and put more actual flashlight reviews sticky
7% (2 votes)
remove all and add review sub forum
30% (9 votes)
Total votes: 30
—
[Reviews] Miboxer C4-12, C2-4k+6k, C2, C4 / Astrolux K1, MF01, MF02, S42, K01, TI3A / BLF Q8 / Kalrus G35, XT11GT / Nitefox UT20 / Niwalker BK-FA30S / Sofirn SF36, SP35 / Imalent DM21TW / Wuben I333 / Ravemen PR1200 / CL06 lantern / Xanes headlamp
[Mods] Skilhunt H03 short / Klarus XT11GT, XT12GTS / Zebralight SC50+ / Imalent DM21TW / colorful anodisation
[Sale] TA based drivers NarsilM or Bistro OTSM 17-22mm, S42, L6, Q8, MF01, SRK, TN42 / Narsil based buck driver for 20-30mm MF01/02, TN40/42, GT, MT09R / Remote switch tail DD board with FET
I don't think that sb considers sticky management to be high priority, so I vote no.
31 knives for sale=USA only ☮♫☯
I voted “No” because I think there are some “older” posts that still are relevant and should still be stickied. I would agree to removing “stickiness” from older posts that are no longer relevant.
Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone.
-Ayn Rand
That would be ideal, but who will ask Mr. Admin do it?
Not me.
31 knives for sale=USA only ☮♫☯
No vote from me. I only browse the forum by categories when I’m going to post something, otherwise I always use the “recent posts” view or search function. I hardly ever see the stickies.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/akrylamid/sets/
Not me neither!
It would be an arduous task, and as has been mentioned, mostly unnecessary. So, the “reward” isn’t enough to warrant the “work” required to do it well.
Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone.
-Ayn Rand
I vote No.
Actually I can do it fairly easy, I developed a little workflow that lets me easily de-sticky reviews and move them to a new category. It’s on my to-do list, hope to get to it soon.
Budget Light Forum ...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!
Cool! But the part I thought would be “hard” was deciding which ones to remove. For me, it wouldn’t be purely date based. So, it would require (for me, if I were the one doing it) at least a cursory read through of each old post, and deciding whether it should be stickied still or let go. If it’s easy for you, I’m all for it.
Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone.
-Ayn Rand
Its not bad to remove the sticky, but review sub forum would be nice
[Reviews] Miboxer C4-12, C2-4k+6k, C2, C4 / Astrolux K1, MF01, MF02, S42, K01, TI3A / BLF Q8 / Kalrus G35, XT11GT / Nitefox UT20 / Niwalker BK-FA30S / Sofirn SF36, SP35 / Imalent DM21TW / Wuben I333 / Ravemen PR1200 / CL06 lantern / Xanes headlamp
[Mods] Skilhunt H03 short / Klarus XT11GT, XT12GTS / Zebralight SC50+ / Imalent DM21TW / colorful anodisation
[Sale] TA based drivers NarsilM or Bistro OTSM 17-22mm, S42, L6, Q8, MF01, SRK, TN42 / Narsil based buck driver for 20-30mm MF01/02, TN40/42, GT, MT09R / Remote switch tail DD board with FET
I agree that there are many stickies that are outdated at BLF. And I definitely think they would be better unstickied.
Sticky threads where all of the photo`s have been blocked by Photobucket making them very difficult to understand especially guides should be deleted.
But in general i voted NO.
John.
Maha C9000 – LaCrosse BC-900 – Floureon BT-C3100 V2.2 – Accumanger 10 and 20 -Thunder AC6 LiitoKala Lii-100 – Cozypony 24W Solar Panel – Soshine H4 – Soshine T2 – Soshine E4S