At the full output, 10,059 lumens, it measures CCT of 4339K and a calculated DUV of –0.0053. If that is true, this would be more like a FA1 tint bin. Super rosy and the 4300K color temp. It would be near identical to the 219B 4500K 9080!
At 23.7 lumens, it measures CCT of 4051K and a calculated DUV of 0.0012
At 4,009 lumens, it measures CCT of 4136K and a calculated DUV of –0.002
Given these values, it seems like Mateminco is really using the FA3 tint bin in this light instead of the FD2 since FD2 is below 4000K and FA3 is above 4000K. Since they are supposed to have only 1,000 of these emitters, they should only be able to make about 50 before they have to switch to the FD2 tint bin, which is also not a bad tint per my test with the FW3A.
Yes, they’ve obviously added some rewrite rules to the web server’s .htaccess file. Nothing you can do, other than DL the images and host them somewhere else.
Good thinking, that should also help avoid losing quality in case imgur uses a compression algorithm like e.g. Facebook and other sites.
Tbh I’m pretty obsessive and I don’t normally upload an image without making at least some kind of alterations (crop, curves adjustments etc.) and then saving it as .png, so I don’t think I’ve ever uploaded straight to imgur from a URL!
Here’s another review. It has beamshots of the M43, nichia MF01, newer modified nichia MF01 (i think), MF01s and some throwers. For some reason it doesn’t look purple or red…it’s pink.
Here are some points:
MF01 head works on the MF01S body but not vice versa as the spring is thicker so the negative contact won’t touch… something like that anyway.