I haven’t tried, but I don’t see why not. If it can run the Stylish extension, it should be able to do this.
…
So, I looked it up. I’m seeing “May 14, 2015: Google Chrome for Android will not be getting extension support any time soon, Chrome developers say …”
However, it seems to work on Firefox on Android. After installing Stylish, I told it to get styles from userstyles.org, searched for “BLF”, and then followed the links to install it.
As it says in the first post:
To use this, install the “Stylish” extension, then search the userstyles.org repository for “BLF” and follow the instructions there.
Hey ToyKeeper! Is there any way to make this work in IE? I know code writers don’t like IE but I just can’t get myself to like Chrome no matter how hard I try. If not I’ll try to figure something else out. Or maybe I’ll use Chrome just for BLF if I have to but it will be with great reluctance.
It looks like M4D M4X explicitly set a background color on each link in that list… or set it once and copy/pasted it a bunch of times. The first half of the list has styled links, while the second half has styled spans. And a few items are bare.
I can override it, but it’s kind of a violation of scope. It would prevent anyone from ever setting a background color in the text of their posts. At least, in links or spans.
So, what do you think? Should it override style mis-uses (and also override normal uses too), or should it allow both (and give us an occasional hard-to-read post like that one)?
Thanks TK! Got it working on my tablet in firefox. Nice for in the evenings, and when I want the classic style I start blf in chrome
It is now even more obvious that the battery is inserted backwards in saypats avatar