LED spec plots

12 posts / 0 new
Last post
DrJones
DrJones's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 5 months ago
Joined: 01/05/2011 - 13:30
Posts: 1044
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
LED spec plots

I took a look at the data sheets, gathered some data (mostly by carefulla reading the plots) of some LEDs and made some plots for comparison.

The data is at 25°C, as given in the data sheets, so thermal sag is not accounted for.

As this is a bit crowded, here's a 'flux per current' plot:

 

And of course the efficacy (flux per power):

 

aurum
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 1 day ago
Joined: 08/09/2010 - 07:59
Posts: 109
Location: Germany

Thanks Cool

Don
Don's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 5 months ago
Joined: 01/12/2010 - 16:32
Posts: 6617
Location: Scotland

Those are interesting thanks. The SST LEDs are really a triumph of brute force over efficiency at least in their ability to take more and more current.

 

The numbers from my light tests are always to be found here.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ApkFM37n_QnRdDU5MDNzOURjYllmZHI...

brted
brted's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 2 weeks ago
Joined: 01/12/2010 - 19:44
Posts: 2371
Location: Atlanta

Thanks for putting that together. It's hard to find numbers that fairly compare the LED's, so the graphs really help out. In the first graph everything stays pretty tight though. Also surprising how different the P7 and MC-E are from each other since they seem kind of like different flavors of the same thing.

Don
Don's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 5 months ago
Joined: 01/12/2010 - 16:32
Posts: 6617
Location: Scotland

Probably because Cree don't sell their best bin MC-E dies to SSC.

 

The numbers from my light tests are always to be found here.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ApkFM37n_QnRdDU5MDNzOURjYllmZHI...

DrJones
DrJones's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 5 months ago
Joined: 01/05/2011 - 13:30
Posts: 1044
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

P7 vs. MCE: That's only because of the different binning scheme (all at 2.8A):

P7 C-bin: 700-800 lm
MC-E M:   749-854 lm
P7 D-bin: 800-900 lm
MC-E N:   854-957 lm

uncajesse
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 2 months ago
Joined: 12/18/2010 - 02:51
Posts: 83
Location: Midwest USA

Thanks, very nice.  Man... for the money, the XM-L just destroys.  But those SSTs both have really amazing power handling without much loss of efficacy (traded for battery life hehehe).  Truely amazing actually, compared to the lowered power LEDs.

I'm a bit surprised at how fast the R2 loses its lunch too.  Now I can finally just ignore anyone who talks about driving an R2 with "a proper driver" and it keeping up with anything today.

sixty545
Offline
Last seen: 4 months 1 week ago
Joined: 10/25/2010 - 14:15
Posts: 702
Location: Denmark (GMT + 1)

Thanks for the graphs. They are clear and informative.

Just copied them to my local FAQ.

KDLST
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 9 months ago
Joined: 12/26/2010 - 08:27
Posts: 226
Location: Belgium

Thanks for the graphs really interesting to see how xml compares to the rest

Huny74
Huny74's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 4 months ago
Joined: 09/22/2010 - 15:38
Posts: 485
Location: Tyskland

Blame you, now I have to order even more XM-L for my upgrades.

At least I can justify it with "enviromentally friendly" :bigsmile:

Match
Match's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 6 months ago
Joined: 11/14/2010 - 11:57
Posts: 1488
Location: South Carolina, USA

Fantastic graphs....but now I realized even more that I need an SST-90 torch, grrr....Tongue out

FlashPilot
FlashPilot's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 50 min ago
Joined: 05/10/2010 - 16:07
Posts: 4573
Location: USA

Thanks Doc,

It would be interesting to compare the SST-50 and XM-L (highest bin for both) in well heat sinked flashlight hosts (to reflect thermal sag), to find out at what current they both reach the same lm. Following the line on your graph, it would appear to happen around 3.6A (without thermal sag). With thermal sag, I wonder if the XM-L would do better up to 5A. Sure, its out of spec but they seem to survive at this level. All very interesting...