Alright, I got a pack of nice NiZN batteries shipped up to me by Match, and decided to do a short round of testing. The light I chose for this little test is the Crelant 7G1, the only pseudo-premium light I own. Not so much for quality, but it's the only multi-mode AA light I own, and the only AA light I have that's designed to take 14500s.
Anyways, beamshot comparisons first, NiZN is on the top, NiMH is on the bottom.
Pics are comparable, taken at 1/40th second, F4.0, ISO 100, 28MM focal length from the same distance. It's slightly difficult to ascertain here, but the NiZN is the brighter of the two. The histograms from the original pictures definitely confirms it.
Here's the nice thing - there's a nice current draw decrease for the voltage boost from the NiZN.
Batteries:
Rayovac "Hybrid" NiMH, 2100mAh claimed. Voltage 1.26V, draw 1.55A
PowerGenix NiZN, 1500mAh claimed. Voltage 1.8V, draw 1.15A
Nice boost, and it really shouldn't affect runtime too much either.
i will take shots with my trustfire S-A2. in this flashlight it is the difference between night and day. a 1.2/1.5 is incredibly dim on this flashlight, as it probably knows its now a AA and not a 14500. go to Ni-zn and its almost as bright as it was with a 14500!
i noticed these things a while back but have not had time to do thorough testing and reviews
Thanks all, it's also really nice to have a working multimeter back. I'd say there's a 20%-ish boost when examining the EV charting of the histogram and the current draw should mean runtimes reasonably close to the manufacturer's.
The only problem I have is with the torch itself - ALL the output levels are boosted, including the low. It's a slick torch, but a 12-13 lumen low just ain't that low. Thankfully, I bought it at wholesale from a local reviewer. I'm not sure I'd pay full retail even if the quality is good.