Review: Starry Light SA-22 4*AA/XM-L2

29 posts / 0 new
Last post
JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8863
Location: Eastern PA
Review: Starry Light SA-22 4*AA/XM-L2

 Starry Light SA-22 4*AA/XM-L2

*SA-22 provided for review courtesy of illuminationsupply.com

"STARRY LIGHT" is a new brand produced by Black Shadow in order to enter the more mainstream flashlight market where Joe Average buys his lights while giving a bit more performance than the usual store brands at an equal or better price.  The SA-22 is their first model and runs on readily available AA alkaline or NiMH cells, gives performance rivalling many Li-Ion lights, is waterproof, and does all this for roughly $22.

PROS & CONS

Pros

  • Cheap, bright, and sturdy!
  • Very little drop in output during first 30 seconds.  Much better than most lights.
  • 262m of ANSI throw
  • Runs on AA cells
  • Waterproof
  • Comfortable in the hand
  • Good finish on the head
  • Reversed polarity protection
  • Decent holster

Cons

  • About 200 lumens shy of the rated maximum output
  • Mild PWm in low and medium modes
  • Flashy modes (SOS & Strobe)
  • No A/R coating on lens (not really expected at this price though)

PERFORMANCE

The Starry Light SA-22 runs on 4 AA cells and makes a very respectable 668 OTF lumens in its highest mode.  In spite of the plastic body, the very well designed aluminum head seems to manage the heat produced by the XM-L2 emitter very well.  Output at turn on was 673.8 OTF lumens.  After 30 seconds it only dropped 5 lumens to 668 lumens.  This is probably the best I've seen from any light I've tested to date.  My output results on high fall short of the claimed 880 lumens, in fact they are 76% of the claimed output but it could be accounted for (for the most part) if their output was emitter lumens.  My measurements are OTF lumens and reflector and lens loss could account for most of the difference between my measurements and Starry Light's.

The beam profile is very nice with a smooth, artifact free spill and a fairly tight hotspot especially considering the small reflector and compact size of the light.  Throw is a very respectable 262 meters and it suits the light's modes well as it is more of an outdoor light with it's lowest mode being over 100 lumens.  With not a whole lot of difference between medium and high output modes, the jump from low to medium is very pronounced.  Unfortunately, low and medium modes fall victim to PWM.  Not the worst I've seen but it is noticeable in both and definitely more-so in low than in medium.  High mode has zero PWM and looks great.  Tagging along for the ride, unfortunately, are strobe and SOS modes.  They work but they're still there.

The tail switch has good feel and works well.  While being light and slim it's very comfortable to hold and still feels very durable and tough.  This would make a great light for storing in the car, being carried by a mechanic or construction worker for his/her day-to-day tasks, or for a camper or boater.  Everything seals tight and the design of the head and tail make for a very watertight flashlight I wouldn't hesitate to take swimming, fishing, or boating.

MODEMANUFACTURER'S CLAIMSMY TESTING RESULTS
High @ 0sn/a673.8 OTF
High @ 30s880668.1 OTF
Mediumn/a417 OTF
Lown/a101.6 OTF
Lux @ 1m22,000cd17,250cd
Throw in Meters260262.67
Spill Beam Anglen/a54 degrees
Center Beam Anglen/a10 degrees

 

PACKAGING and CONSTRUCTION

The SA-22 came in a retail hanging package designed for retail brick & mortar display which is the role Black Shadow created the Starry Light brand to fill.  While not a bad package it has a feel of cheapness about it.  I think it must be the colors and general design of the box that makes it seem that way to me.  In reality it's not really any different than what other pricier brands use but it somehow feels/looks cheaper.  Brief instructions are on one side and performance specs on the other.

Inside the box is a vacuum formed holder that the flashlight snaps into.  The back of the holder contains the accessories and holster.

Accessories consist of a spare O-ring, a lanyard, an instruction sheet, and the holster.

Here is the "User Manual" sheet.  It's pretty basic but is in English and, while not very professional looking, it provides the needed information.

The holster is actually very nice and fits the light very well.  It has a sturdy belt loop setup and a sturdy plastic "D" ring if you wanted to clip the holster to a bag or something.

Here you can see the printing on either of the flat sides and the narrow profile very similar to a TK35 or ZY-T08

Removing the bezel reveals why the SA-22 would make such a great boat light or shallow dive/swimming light.
The reflector is separated from the O-ring, lens, and bezel by a lip in the head.  The reflector is mounted from the back while the lens O-ring seats on a machined lip, followed by the lens, and finally it is all tightened and sealed by the threaded bezel.  This makes for a flawlessly sealed lens with no need for a separate bezel O-ring.  This design makes for a single O-ring and zero way for water to get past unless the light is submerged in deep water.  The light itself may be rated for 2m but I am sure the lens setup would be good for at least 30.  If water is going to get into this light it won't be at the lens.

The only problem with the implementation (and it's not truly a problem per say) is the O-ring chosen for the lens is far to large in O.D. as you can clearly see in the pictures below.  It's more an inconvenience than a real problem since it can still be pressed into place for a perfect seal using the lens.

The back of the pill and reflector is doubly protected from reversed polarity with a physical lip surrounding the positive battery contact and by grooves in the outside of the driver pill ensuring that it can be installed only one way to the battery tube/body.

With the pill and reflector removed you can see how the inner assembly drops into the head from the back and seats against the lip in the front.  A this, hard plastic bushing/ring sits on the rim of the reflector to keep it from contacting the front lip of the head directly.

The reflector is a very nice SMO with a perfectly centered LED.  The reflector and base thread together to make a single unit.

Here you can see the two pieces unthreaded and the use of thermal grease (of some sort) to help the reflector be used to wick some heat from the pill.
The emitter sits on a 16mm mcpcb with a layer of thermal grease under it.  You could replace this with up to a 20mm star easily.

The entire pill with the retaining ring weighs in at 40.3 grams

The reflector/pill assembly needs to spin freely when threading the body onto the head.  This is probably why there is a lip between the reflector and lens assemblies.  Even with the pill retaining ring fully tightened you will notice a touch of looseness that allows the inner guts to spin inside the head.  It's also why they used a hard plastic ring between the reflector lip and the head lip it sits on.  Metal on metal would wear and to use a silicon O-ring would be too grabby and get chewed up.

Here you can see two ridges inside the front of the body/battery tube, one wide and one narrow.  These slide into matching grooves in the base of the pill ensuring that the battery poles and driver mate up only one way.  They also grab the pill and turn the whole inner head assembly as you thread on the body tube.

Ample square threading ensures against cross threading and makes for a strong connection.  Lots of silicon thread grease and a thick O-ring at the base ensure smooth threading and waterproofing.  The O-ring really does seal tightly against the head and should easily provide the 2m depth at which it's rated.

Inside the battery tube there are marking to show which way to insert the cells.  4 cells go in, two in each direction, connecting them in series to provide between 4.8v-6v depending on what type of cells you use.  Eneloops would be your best choice.

The back of the body tube contains the switch section.  A plastic decal with "Function Switch" printed on it covers the two screws that hold the switch to the tail like a beauty trim ring.  A thin knife blade inserted under it popped it right off to expose the screws underneath.

With the screws removed the entireswitch plate and springs comes right out.

 

The reverse clickie switch is mounted directly to the spring PCB.  This switch assembly sits inside a one-piece silicone switch boot/gasket combo which, in turn, sits snug inside the plastic outer housing.

CONCLUSION

That's about it, folks  For $22 you get a bright, durable, waterproof light that runs on easily available AA cells.  It's the perfect gift for mom & dad or the grandparents when you want to share your love for bright flashlights but not the responsibility of running it on Li-Ion cells.  Rumored issues of threading problems are totally unwarranted IMO and my experience.  I can't see how you could mess it up or create problems with this one.  The guys at Illumination-Supply were sure it was user error that raised the question of threading and wanted me to offer my unbiased opinion of the light and the threads.  Now you have it.  I see no issues and can't really see how they could be a problem. 

 

It's a great light for the glove box, a bug out bag, or camping pack or as a gift for your favorite non-flashaholic.  Perfect? Not at all.  Lose the flashy modes and the PWM and it would come close, especially at this price.  For the aforementioned purposes I have to call this one Mac approved!

Edited by: sb56637 on 09/02/2017 - 11:48
dave_
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 2 weeks ago
Joined: 04/19/2013 - 08:45
Posts: 456
Location: Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Great review, thank you!
Now I am looking even more forward to getting mine!
(I need a smiley that drools over a flashlight. ^^)

zeremefico
zeremefico's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 hours 5 min ago
Joined: 03/27/2012 - 02:44
Posts: 1335
Location: Greece

Great review Mac.
What do you think about the quality of the button.
I would prefer a thicker silicone cap for the switch. I think it will be the first post to have wear problem in the future and I afraid it is not easy to find a replacement.
Except that it is a very good option, especially for users who don’t want lion batteries, as you mentioned above.

₪₪₪₪ ΟΥΔΕΝ ΚΡΥΠΤΟΝ ΥΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΗΛΙΟ ₪₪₪₪

My YouTube channel

Flashlights & edc gear

K40M F16

MRsDNF
MRsDNF's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 hours 11 min ago
Joined: 12/22/2011 - 21:18
Posts: 13256
Location: A light beam away from the missus in the land of Aus.

Thanks JM. Your review makes me think I should of ordered more than one.

 

djozz quotes, "it came with chinese lettering that is chinese to me".

                      "My man mousehole needs one too"

old4570 said "I'm not an expert , so don't suffer from any such technical restrictions".

Old-Lumens. Highly admired and cherished member of Budget Light Forum. 11.5.2011 - 20.12.16. RIP.

 

DARCANGEL
DARCANGEL's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 04/11/2012 - 00:06
Posts: 960
Location: the nickel city,New York

Great review Johnny,I assume the BLF edition ones will be better with modes/PWM,which is great.I can't wait to get mine and thanks for the breakdown of the guts of this light.I think swapping out a sinkpad or Noctigon board will help manage some heat.

mfpmax
mfpmax's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 10 months ago
Joined: 09/26/2012 - 12:22
Posts: 377
Location: Florida

Do you have a head diameter measurement for those that may be looking at using diffuser accessories?

JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8863
Location: Eastern PA

mfpmax wrote:
Do you have a head diameter measurement for those that may be looking at using diffuser accessories?
Exactly 37mm O.D.
vēer
vēer's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 months 5 days ago
Joined: 01/07/2012 - 14:23
Posts: 2838
Location: N Europe

Thanks for your review, Mac! Good to see that only real issues that someone might encounter could be PWM with stock light.

wolf359
Offline
Last seen: 11 months 1 week ago
Joined: 04/23/2013 - 18:16
Posts: 269
Location: UK

bugger this review makes me wish i bought more than one from the group buy

Anyway enough of my short sightedness, great review as always thank you for all your time and effort.

Ledsmoke
Ledsmoke's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 7 hours ago
Joined: 08/08/2011 - 16:05
Posts: 1995
Location: Denmark

Thank you for the review JM. I am glad I got some in the GB

~ Ledsmoke ~

Dutch humor:

[quote=djozz]

 I do not think that the BLF-community ben

Gj
Gj's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 4 days ago
Joined: 06/26/2013 - 15:44
Posts: 3063
Location: NY,USA

Thanks for the great review. Thanks to IS, too. 

 

So glad the manufacturer take the trouble to label the switch, so many people spend months trying to figure out what the button on their flashlight is for. Tongue Out

OrionLight
OrionLight's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 11 months ago
Joined: 12/15/2013 - 08:47
Posts: 404

Thanks for the great review JM! Your reviews never disappoint! Did you happen to do any kind of run time tests?

DPRoberts
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 1 week ago
Joined: 07/23/2013 - 01:42
Posts: 52
Location: Sitting down and facing front

Hmmm…. I’m not sure if it’s a matter of lighting / color correcting, QC issues, misleading photos, or what, but the photos in this review show a far more drastic body/head mismatch than the manufacturer does. It’s one of the things I’ve been concerned about, especially since some other reviewers have mentioned that it’s noticeable.

To see what I’m talking about, compare Alibaba’s photo (first) with JohnnyMac’s photo (second) and Wilson’s review photo (third):

JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8863
Location: Eastern PA

OrionLight wrote:
Thanks for the great review JM! Your reviews never disappoint! Did you happen to do any kind of run time tests?
Nah...not this time.  This was supposed to be a quickie review and ended up a bit more than I originally intended.  I may do one but don't count on it.  I'm super behind on things right now nad have a bunch of reviews I need to make time to plow through right now. Wink
OrionLight
OrionLight's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 11 months ago
Joined: 12/15/2013 - 08:47
Posts: 404

JM – I look forward to seeing more of your reviews!!

Regarding the color difference, it’s really not that noticeable in person. Perhaps the lighting for the pictures brings out the color difference more, but it’s not too bad. It’s certainly not as bad as the Terralux Colorado. Though my opinion weighs much less than JM’s, I’m really happy with this light. It’s been the one I reach for the most when doing every day tasks. Reliable, easy battery maintenance, and great output are enough for me.

JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8863
Location: Eastern PA

OrionLight wrote:
JM - I look forward to seeing more of your reviews!! Regarding the color difference, it's really not that noticeable in person. Perhaps the lighting for the pictures brings out the color difference more, but it's not too bad. It's certainly not as bad as the Terralux Colorado. Though my opinion weighs much less than JM's, I'm really happy with this light. It's been the one I reach for the most when doing every day tasks. Reliable, easy battery maintenance, and great output are enough for me.
Thanks, OL. Your opinion weighs just as much as mine. I'm glad to hear that you feel pretty much the same about it as I do. 
OrionLight
OrionLight's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 11 months ago
Joined: 12/15/2013 - 08:47
Posts: 404

By the way, what tool did you use to remove the bezel ring? I was able to get the retaining ring off from the inside but wasn’t sure how the bezel ring was even held in place until your review picture showed it was threaded.

JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8863
Location: Eastern PA

The color difference really isn't as bad as in the pics but it's definitely there. Hard not to be with two separate materials with different textures and different finishes. 

ezarc
Offline
Last seen: 8 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: 10/17/2011 - 18:23
Posts: 2101
Location: South Aus

Thanks for the review.

garrybunk
garrybunk's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 2 days ago
Joined: 10/31/2011 - 09:25
Posts: 6091
Location: Johnstown, PA

Thanks JM for another great review! 

-Garry

My Bike Lights Thread, Optics (TIR) Comparison Beamshots, Diffusion Techniques

, MTBR’s Lights & Night Riding Forum
NOTE: Now hosting my photos from my Google account. Post up if you can’t see them. Older photos hosted on Photobucket or Flickr may disappear (PM me if you want access to them).
sesgum
sesgum's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 15 hours ago
Joined: 01/01/2012 - 14:39
Posts: 1067
Location: New Jersey, US

Thanks for the nice review Johnny.

Beachlogger
Offline
Last seen: 5 months 4 days ago
Joined: 12/04/2013 - 23:08
Posts: 991
Location: S.E. Alaska

A real nice review . Seems to me if water was to get into this light, it would be around the switch area, unless I’m missing something.

JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8863
Location: Eastern PA

Beachlogger wrote:
A real nice review . Seems to me if water was to get into this light, it would be around the switch area, unless I'm missing something.
That would be the place, I agree.  Easy enough to remedy with that large flat contact area.  A thin layer of silicon sealant would resolve any possible leaking issues.  I'm sure it's watertight as it is but would be the weak link in the chain at further depths.
Streamer
Streamer's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: 12/01/2011 - 21:06
Posts: 3792
Location: TX

Laughing  So if yur a deep-C-diver, squirt sum silly-cone in 'er  Laughing

Beachlogger
Offline
Last seen: 5 months 4 days ago
Joined: 12/04/2013 - 23:08
Posts: 991
Location: S.E. Alaska
JohnnyMac wrote:

Beachlogger wrote:
A real nice review . Seems to me if water was to get into this light, it would be around the switch area, unless I’m missing something.
That would be the place, I agree.  Easy enough to remedy with that large flat contact area.  A thin layer of silicon sealant would resolve any possible leaking issues.  I’m sure it’s watertight as it is but would be the weak link in the chain at further depths.

The thin silicon layer in between the two plastic pieces was what I was thinking also

Beachlogger
Offline
Last seen: 5 months 4 days ago
Joined: 12/04/2013 - 23:08
Posts: 991
Location: S.E. Alaska
Streamer wrote:

Laughing  So if yur a deep-C-diver, squirt sum silly-cone in ‘er  Laughing

I’m not a deep c diver, but where I live we get 180 inches of rain a year and water gets into everything no mater how hard you try to keep it out

Streamer
Streamer's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: 12/01/2011 - 21:06
Posts: 3792
Location: TX

I hear ya Beachlogger.  With that much water, you best be safe than sorry.

trevglas
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 7 months ago
Joined: 03/28/2014 - 20:00
Posts: 14
Location: MO

I just ordered one of these from illuminationsupply.com!!! Hope its as good as you said!

trevglas
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 7 months ago
Joined: 03/28/2014 - 20:00
Posts: 14
Location: MO

Got mine from illuminationsupply.com the other day and I am very impressed with it for only 22 dollars. Others have talked about the PWM on the non BLF edition but I have not noticed it at ALL. My only complaint are the plastic threads, I can see how it could get stripped out if you arent really careful.