Well this is for sure true:
Beyond that, though, look at the MTBR thread, there’s some history behind this.
Amateur summary from my attempts to read through it:
Yes, Yinding cloned a copy of a light.
Yes, the usual game happened — copies of copies of copies, each round cheaper and crappier.
It’s a bit vague yet about why the people who made the ‘original’ good Yinding light quit supplying it.
Either
— the original quit being ordered as waves of clones came on, or
— Yinding turned out a second batch that were degraded copies themselves, then the clones followed, or
— Suppliers got cheap crap copies, labeled as Yinding, and sold them claiming they were the 2nd batch from Yinding, or
— ???
(opinions seem to vary, see the MTBR thread for speculation)
Anyhow it was, to paraphrase Yogi Bera, another instance where the light became so popular that nobody sold it anymore.
The guy at MTBR worked with someone at GB who, it is said,
— located the original factory source, and
— got them to make another batch to the original spec.
MTBR got some and checked — and those were good.
MTBR then worked out an improved neutral white light emitter.
Both are now for sale (or back ordered, batches come in fairly quickly)
People at MTBR are taking the new ones apart and comparing them to the first round from a couple of years ago.
So far, looks like the heatsinking is done to the original good standard (that’s where the copies-of-copies screwed up badly).
So far, there are some differences in the driver (ample pictures available if anyone can figure out what’s what)
Ya know how it works by now.
People have to keep taking each new batch apart and watch for crap being substituded for good work.
GB and other suppliers won’t be checking for quality control.
Thats up to us.
In the software industry, they call it Charlie Checking.
There’s Alpha checking for gross function
There’s Beta testing for functionality to spec
And there’s “Sorry, Charlie” when the product goes out to the users.