Remove old sticky topics

12 posts / 0 new
Last post
Lexel
Lexel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 59 min ago
Joined: 11/01/2016 - 08:00
Posts: 2893
Location: Germany
Remove old sticky topics
Yes older than 2 years
17% (5 votes)
No
47% (14 votes)
Yes all of em and put more actual flashlight reviews sticky
7% (2 votes)
remove all and add review sub forum
30% (9 votes)
Total votes: 30

[Reviews] Miboxer C4-12, C2-4k+6k, C2, C4 / Astrolux K1, MF01, S42, K01 / BLF Q8 / Kalrus G35, XT11GT / Nitefox UT20 / Sofirn SF36, SP35 / Imalent DM21TW / Wuben I333 / Ravemen PR1200 / CL06 lantern / Xanes headlamp

[Mods] Skilhunt H03 short / Klarus XT12GTS / colorful anodisation

[Sale] TA drivers Narsil or Bistro, XHP35 E2-3C

Edited by: Lexel on 08/18/2017 - 19:17
raccoon city
raccoon city's picture
Online
Last seen: 1 min 2 sec ago
Joined: 10/06/2010 - 02:35
Posts: 9523
Location: रॅकून शहर Palm Desert CA USA

I don't think that sb considers sticky management to be high priority, so I vote no.  :BEER:

DavidEF
DavidEF's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 1 hour ago
Joined: 06/05/2014 - 06:00
Posts: 5093
Location: Salisbury, North Carolina, USA

I voted “No” because I think there are some “older” posts that still are relevant and should still be stickied. I would agree to removing “stickiness” from older posts that are no longer relevant.

Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone.
-Ayn Rand

raccoon city
raccoon city's picture
Online
Last seen: 1 min 2 sec ago
Joined: 10/06/2010 - 02:35
Posts: 9523
Location: रॅकून शहर Palm Desert CA USA

DavidEF wrote:

I would agree to removing “stickiness” from older posts that are no longer relevant.

That would be ideal, but who will ask Mr. Admin do it?

Not me.  ;)

Mike C
Mike C's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 12 hours ago
Joined: 01/22/2014 - 08:03
Posts: 1673
Location: Sweden

No vote from me. I only browse the forum by categories when I’m going to post something, otherwise I always use the “recent posts” view or search function. I hardly ever see the stickies.

DavidEF
DavidEF's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 1 hour ago
Joined: 06/05/2014 - 06:00
Posts: 5093
Location: Salisbury, North Carolina, USA

raccoon city wrote:

DavidEF wrote:

I would agree to removing “stickiness” from older posts that are no longer relevant.


That would be ideal, but who will ask Mr. Admin do it?


Not me.  ;)


Not me neither! Shocked

It would be an arduous task, and as has been mentioned, mostly unnecessary. So, the “reward” isn’t enough to warrant the “work” required to do it well.

Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone.
-Ayn Rand

Trevi_lux
Trevi_lux's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 47 min ago
Joined: 09/04/2012 - 10:52
Posts: 1989
Location: Spain

I vote No.

sb56637
sb56637's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 12 min ago
Joined: 01/08/2010 - 09:29
Posts: 5941
Location: The Light

Actually I can do it fairly easy, I developed a little workflow that lets me easily de-sticky reviews and move them to a new category. It’s on my to-do list, hope to get to it soon.

Budget Light Forum ...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!

DavidEF
DavidEF's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 1 hour ago
Joined: 06/05/2014 - 06:00
Posts: 5093
Location: Salisbury, North Carolina, USA

sb56637 wrote:
Actually I can do it fairly easy, I developed a little workflow that lets me easily de-sticky reviews and move them to a new category. It’s on my to-do list, hope to get to it soon.

Cool! But the part I thought would be “hard” was deciding which ones to remove. For me, it wouldn’t be purely date based. So, it would require (for me, if I were the one doing it) at least a cursory read through of each old post, and deciding whether it should be stickied still or let go. If it’s easy for you, I’m all for it. Big Smile

Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone.
-Ayn Rand

Lexel
Lexel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 59 min ago
Joined: 11/01/2016 - 08:00
Posts: 2893
Location: Germany

Its not bad to remove the sticky, but review sub forum would be nice

[Reviews] Miboxer C4-12, C2-4k+6k, C2, C4 / Astrolux K1, MF01, S42, K01 / BLF Q8 / Kalrus G35, XT11GT / Nitefox UT20 / Sofirn SF36, SP35 / Imalent DM21TW / Wuben I333 / Ravemen PR1200 / CL06 lantern / Xanes headlamp

[Mods] Skilhunt H03 short / Klarus XT12GTS / colorful anodisation

[Sale] TA drivers Narsil or Bistro, XHP35 E2-3C

Agro
Offline
Last seen: 27 min 2 sec ago
Joined: 05/14/2017 - 11:16
Posts: 905
Location: Ślōnsk

I agree that there are many stickies that are outdated at BLF. And I definitely think they would be better unstickied.

Tinderbox UK
Tinderbox UK's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 10 hours ago
Joined: 12/26/2016 - 06:17
Posts: 297
Location: England, United Kingdom

Sticky threads where all of the photo`s have been blocked by Photobucket making them very difficult to understand especially guides should be deleted.

 

But in general i voted NO.

 

John.

SkyRC MC3000 – Maha C9000 – LaCrosse BC-900 – Floureon BT-C3100 V2.2 – Accumanger 10 and 20 -Thunder AC6 LiitoKala Lii-100 – Cozypony 24W Solar Panel – Soshine H4 – Soshine T2 – Soshine E4S