Review: Xtar TZ58 (pre-release)

Xtar TZ58

This fine flashlight arrived unheralded, sporting stickers in lieu of laser-etched graphics, identifying brand/settings. I am proceeding on the exciting assumption that the TZ58 is a soon-to-be-released addition to Xtar's tactical series and that this evaluation sample is a pre-production flashlight sent me for purposes of review.

The TZ58 is a very good flashlight. With the tactical lanyard ring and clip, my first thought was Olight Warrior but the Fenix TA 21/20 would be a closer comparison, except for the TA's much less impressive XR-E emitter. My gripes are few and while a top quality torch like this will compete well in the general market, it may not appeal to the hard-core flashlight crowd. Foy's opinion is easily justified; two amps. A safely driven XM-L makes sense for the vast ocean of consumers because even at two amps, the T6 emitter is a sterling performer. It will likely be brighter than most people expect. No doubt, many will find the mag-ring mode control entertaining and with everything else this light offers, the TZ58 will probably be the best flashlight most customers will ever own. For the flashlight faithful however, XM-L greatness lies beyond three amps and at an expected $87.80 MSRP, better performers can be had for less. With those caveats, the TZ58 is:

Foyapproved

Bottom line: The Xtar TZ58 is a top quality flashlight with lots of features and superb performance. It will have tremendous appeal to the buying public while perhaps being less compelling to flashaholics. I really like this torch but I hold back from unrestrained, giddy enthusiasm because of its lawyer-safe, consumer friendly 2.0 amp driver. The TZ58 is a very good flashlight.

What I like:

- aesthetics

- blocked knurling

- beam profile

- threads

- strike bezel

- overall quality/fit and finish

What I do not like:

- under driven

- available mode choice

- loose control ring

Xtar TZ58 Tactical Mode Control Ring Flashlight

$87.80 (estimated) this pre-release sample was provided for purposes of review, courtsey Xtar flashlights. http://www.xtarlight.com/en/05-chanpin/p-001.asp

working voltage: 2.9 - 8.4 volts <<update>>

single XM-L/U2 emitter

operates on one 18650/18700 or 17670 lithium-ion battery

magnetic-ring mode control user interface: high, low and fast strobe

anodized 6061 aluminum

non-tail standing, tactical, forward clicky tail cap switch with 14mm boot

IPX rating unknown; other Xtar TZ lights are IPX-8 (control ring may effect water resistance)

tail cap draw: (IMR 18650)

2.20 amps - high

.23 amp - low

Xtar 18700/2600 protected

2.0 amps - high

.20 amp - low

Solarforce 18650/2400 protected

2.10 amps - high

.22 amp - low

Panasonic 18650/2350 unprotected

2.0 amps - high

.22 amp - low

Foyometer: comparative light meter reading

32 - Foy's dimly lit office

92 - M6

128 - TZ58 (IMR)

130 - L2P/UF XM-L

162 - C88 ala E1320 (King Kong)

Light arrived with these handy stickers and comprise 90% of information I've been able to gather . . .

Hopefully I'm correct assuming this is a pre-release flashlight and not just something banging around Xtar's shop that they decided to send me . . . for whatever reason.

The TZ58 is a handsome light along the lines of an Olight Warrior. It's a bit head heavy but otherwise feels great in the hand and I actually like this strike bezel because the spaces are wide enough for a useful amount of light to escape while standing on its head. Fantastic for night-stand duty.

The control ring gives the TZ58 a necessarily long head but it is well executed. There's a lot going on here aesthetically but the designers seemed to have pulled it off without the light appearing busy or superfluous. The "cooling" fins and design-cuts on the control ring are the only affectations and in this reviewer's opinion, would have been better left off.

I like the blocked knurling very much and the ano on this particular torch is superb.

The TZ58 looks expensive, which is certainly a compliment for any flashlight . . . and appropriate for a torch costing upwards of $90.

Size comparison to a Solarforce M6. The TZ58 is a little brighter than the M6, by the way.

The control ring is magnetic with a spring-loaded bearing for detents. It changes modes flawlessly and my only complaint is some looseness in the ring. The perception of quality would have been far greater if the control ring were a little more snug in operation.

Emitter centered snobs take note; the TZ58's XM-L is well endowed with bulls-eye.

Looks like somebody's pointy tool got away from them . . .

Machine work is second to none and the aluminum finish is outstanding . . .

. . . of note particularly are these spectacular threads . . .

. . . not only are they enormously thick and square, but they are cut smooth and quite deep . . .

. . . truly remarkable threads and they feel even better than they look.

Battery fit is snug and an Xtar 18700 extends past the tube but still easily fits under the cap.

The below beam shots were all taken with a 1/4 second shutter speed @f2.8.

TZ58 with an IMR.

L2P/UF XM-L.

C88 ala E1320 with a King Kong.

The TZ58 is a superb flashlight, perfect for many uses and made to appeal to a broad audience. I'm not sure I would pay $90 for it but am sure it will be worth that to an average, high-end user.

Foy

Great review, Foy. Beautiful pics.

Plenty of photo's and info. Thanks!

Btw, do you have your own leprechaun who takes those photo's between the house and fence?

Thank you . . . although I could use a leprechaun every now and then, none are forthcoming as of yet.

onecanhopeFoy

Great review foy! It seems the build quality is excellent. Any idea how the driver does at below 3,6V?

Looks nice shame about the High and low mode only where is medium?

I think the Xtar TZ20 XML-T6 would be better, O.K it does not have The ring.

Driven harder and has medium. Is also cheaper.

Very cool to see pre-releases on BLF! Thanks for the great review Foy! Frontpage'd and Sticky'd.

Pretty remarkable that the ceiling bounce comes within 2 units on your light meter to the UF XM-L considering it's 2A compared to 2.8A.

The threading is gorgeous on that light!

So Xstar just send you flashlights in an envelope/box with no other notes or anything? Do you have to send them back? They assume whenever you get a light you are going to write a review and post it online? Do they care which site you post it on?

I don't have any other reason for asking other than I am just curious.

This light looks really cool. Awesome threads and I love the control ring feature. imjealousoffoy.

+1! I’d really like to know how this works. :slight_smile:

alsojealousoffoyjohnny

I do not know how it works with Foy, but with me we usual agree on email that I have time to do the review, before the light is shipped (But sometimes they slip in an extra light). The manufacturers does know where I usual post my reviews and do not need to ask each time. Many times the manufacturer want the review written asap, because they want to start selling it (I have received lights with DHL on some fast service).

And for you jealousy, remember that it is not a free light, but does include some work, even if you do not really like or need the light. Sometimes it is a very nice light to get, at other times not so great (even if it is a good light), but you always have to give the light a fair review.


And that TZ58 looks good, I wonder how it will compare to some other lights.


Believe me, I’m well aware it’s not a free light. I’ve done many reviews here and they are extremely time consuming and a lot of work. The difference is I not only did all that work but had to pay for the light in the first place. For me, I think it is easier to be objective and write a fair review on a light I have no personal interest in. The lights I’ve reviewed are ones I liked already and spent my money on. They have a positive standing to start with based on looks and previous reports from others. Having a manufacturer like Xtar ship a random light I have no bias in one way or the other is a chance, IMO, to give an extremely fair and unbiased review.

Are you sure beamshots are ok? TZ58 looks very dim and floody...

It's not underdriven, it's driven reasonably for fairly small 1x18650 light.

PS. And I don't like the way it looks, it's "humpbacked" and out of propotion.

Awesome review once again Foy........

HKJ is exactly right; I've done several lights for Xtar so, they know where I'm going to post. If they wanted a piece on another board they would probably choose a well known member on that forum.

With the first few lights, I received an e-mail each time inviting me to review a specific flashlight and I had to respond before they sent the light. Also, sometimes the light comes from SZ Wholesale and other times directly from Xtar. Communication between the two might often be inconsistent. This TZ58 came directly from Xtar in Shenzhen via EMS express mail, post marked six days prior to arrival so, I'm not sure if they were in a terrible hurry . . .

This is the second time I've gotten a light with no specific request for a review but it is the first time I've received one that was not already available for purchase. And, as I said at the begining of the review; I still have no information from Xtar so, it may not be as significant as I've imagined. Because of the circumstances I've outlined however, (stickers for labels, direct from Xtar, etc.) I'm fairly confident it's a pre-release.

Let's see . . . the other question; do I have to send the light back. They have yet to ask for a light to be returned. If they did, I would gladly do so.

I also like very much what JohnnyMac said. For any manufacturer to drop a light in my lap with a one sentence request to publish my thoughts about their product, could be a huge gamble . . . assuming more than a couple of people give a hack what Foy thinks. It's not hard for me to imagine that Xtar may have been hoping for more enthusiasm from me on this particular flashlight.

What I prefer to think is they simply wanted another opinion and that Foy is (or will be) one of many voices heard. Either way, I'm not too proud to admit; it was a gratifying gesture.

humbledFoy

The flashlight looks very cool, I like it.

sz . . . as in, SZ Wholesale?

Foy

I received an update; this XM-L is a U2, not a T6. Will make the change above and I was told further specs are forthcoming.

Foy

And nice light. Except it seems unnecessary big. And only 2 modes. And underdriven. And expensive.

But apart from that bit, which I do realise now reads like a sentence, it does look like a very high quality.

But one thing I am missing from your review - Will it COOK! LOL