I do often have some queue, at the current time it is very bad for >2800mAh batteries, but I only have one Vapcell branded battery in queue at the current time and it goes on the tester very soon.
I do not have a red 2800mAh from your, but I have a black I bought myself, it is tested, but not published yet.
The 4500mAh is the one I have left in queue.
I test most batteries I get or buy, but a few do not get published for different reason: they get to old before I can test them, another reason can be a fault on my test station, (This happens a few times each year), sometimes I can use the data, sometimes not. And sometimes I makes mistakes when testing.
With >2800mAh I have a couple of months queue, but the test station for the smaller sizes is basically empty. I have been using it to test cheap batteries on (I do not care about the <=2800mAh rating for cheap batteries).
The reason for the split at 2800mAh is to always test same capacity on same test station, this gives the absolutely best comparison (There is a small difference between the two test stations).
Indeed. I was not a fan of 16340 format. Too close to 18350 and way less capable.
But this cell significantly reduces the gap.
And add availability of USB rechargable cells - 16340 becomes interesting.
16340 is far too large already….but nevertheless acceptable
I’ve worn lights up to 25.4 mm in diameter - so even 21700 would do.
backpack ones
Lumintop GT Mini 18350 for quite some time already
the size difference between 16340 and 18350 is meaningless here
I really wish I had a better driver in my Utorch S1 Mini. BLF firmware, FET, good cell, quad E21…ah, that’s a nice dream.
And some really low diameter 16340 light, say 19-19.5 mm would be even better.