We thought it was being sent, but not confirmed yet. Hhmm - not sure if they used/will use DHL.
Friday update: YES! It's on the way via DHL. Rcv'd 8 hrs ago in Singapore.
I have a XHP50.2 (5000K) in a smooth 49mm reflector and the hotspot is completely without dark center, the tint shift from hotspot to corona to spill is there but not anything disturbing.
I’m sure you have adressed it Dale and then please ignore my question, but still: did you check that the focus is correct?
heheh 10 minutes after your post Tom we received DHL tracking 
replied with you added as recipient
I agree with 99% of what Teacher posted, the only part I don’t agree with is sending him to China! 
I think that sac02 is the right person to have on the team thinking about testing. I’m not convinced that a trip to China is in order, but I would be willing to chip in to get an early sample into sac02’s hands. I’m almost embarrassed to admit the post above really opened my eyes regarding test requirements, as an engineer, I really should have realized that “All lights tested before shipping” was far too open a statement, akin to ‘designing’ a flashlight by saying ‘an aluminum tube with an LED, battery, and switch’.
The Miller is also right in his statements regarding overly strict test requirements, it would be easy to make the requirements so strict as to make the light unaffordable to produce. On the other hand, the recent examples of the S41 and the Cometta (or however that lights name is spelled) show what damage a poorly tested new design can do.
Well said (all but the “NO China part for teacher” (me) that is… :person_facepalming: … Where is the “love” man??? :cry: … )
I can’ speak about the S41 from personal experience, but I can about the Cometa. In short, it was a disaster. All one has to do to verify that is do a ‘search’ and do some reading.
As far as I am concerned, another set of “trained eyes” looking at this thing; eyes familiar with manufacturing parameters & processes: could only be a positive.
A win - win so to speak. 
It is a compromise.
A flashlight is not an aeroplane that can kill many people when it fails and has strict regulations for quality control. So there is not a minimum level that quality control neccesarily must be at (well, it must not short batteries out of the box, so there is a minimum even for flashlights). The level of quality control is is determined by the customers in the form of value for money, and by the manufacturer who has to asses how much money and effort will be spent on fixing and refunds afterwards (and reputation damage) and determine the level of QC accordingly. If a product is really cheap, customers (ought to) accept a sloppy quality control, a percentage of items that does not work, or only after a fix. And I demand my Zeiss binoculars to work flawlessly and be completely waterproof.
The Q8 is in between, you pay a fair amount of money for it and for that money you may expect it to be well designed, meet the specs, and work out of the box. But for this money it does not have to be perfect and survive a lifetime of abuse. I think and hope that Thorfire realises that (The Miller tells them that too ) and takes care of sufficient quality control.
Let’s assume the price is even made higher by $5 just to have ‘higher’ quality control, will it have the assurance of avoiding ala Cometa fiasco?
About this test
I was thinking a full ramp up and down.
Would be more then any groupbuy before and mean driver, LEDs, retainer ring are all mounted correctly and there is contact.
I don’t think we can ask for more or longer tests
Again building lights is what Thorfire does and they know good execution is important.
I think we raised the bar on the Q8 with things specified not done before, but there is a limit.
We have take problems of previous groupbuys into account.
With 1100 Q8s it is almost impossible none of those will have a problem, even expensive clean room made SSDs, high end cars and such have the occasional failure.
Issues;
Poorly packaged X5/X6, result dinged lights, chipped or crushed wooden boxes.
So packaging test specified.
Rushed after first test sample with the Cometa
So we say it is done when done and take the time, keep our head cool and holding the horses.
Flickering none functional lights received, sometimes just a tightening of the driver retainer ring needed
So we specify a simple test to see this, or other issues making it not turn on so this cannot happen with the Q8.
I do not feel inclined to add to this specs and demands onbevery little detail that is plain and simple in the realm of the professional manufacturer.
I really aim for avoiding a Cometa fiasco within the current price point, it should be possible and it is one of the things that The Miller has been very keen on from the start of the Q8 project.
I’m not interested in a supplier trip to China, I do that enough for my day job, so look elsewhere, lol. And while I’d be more than willing to review a light and give my perspective on it, I think the development team of the Q8 are more deserving of getting to put their hands on the light first.
Even though it is being referred to as a “prototype”, I get the feeling that it’s pretty late in development to start asking Thorfire for more specific quality or testing items, that wasn’t really what I was suggesting. But on the other hand, I don’t think it is unreasonable to at least ask Thorfire in general how they confirm quality of a new product. For example, do they do ANY durability testing? Thermal shock or thermal cycle testing for the PCB? Material or coating certs? Blah Blah Blah here I go again…
I’ve only been monitoring the GT project a little. It seems to still be much earlier in development, where it makes more sense to start defining what (if any) the quality standards will be. My input (if desired) would probably be more appropriate over there, if it is deemed useful.
What teacher is say'n is, at least used to be, quite common in the industry. Always helps to have someone there look'n over their shoulders.
For QC, dunno. We can't get answers to simple questions, yet alone questions on materials, coatings, etc. We are too far removed from the people that really might know, and they do not speak English. You can ask the questions, but at best we would get some vague unspecific response. I'm hoping the good/bad experiences we have had and made public here has led to improvements in the process overall, and I do believe it has.
I'd like to know what bin and tint the LED's are for example, and I'd be happy if a monkey tried turning each manufactured light on and off and could reject it if it doesn't turn on. This is probably more than what happens to 95% of the flashlights made. The Fenix's, SureFire's, ArmyTek and a few others probably do that but of course they are in the vast minority of units made and sold.
At one point I know of, Dell dropped power on testing every PC coming off their lines, though the level of automation is quite advanced, and they said they can live with the resulting failure rate. It comes down to cost tradeoffs for failure rate vs. additional testing according to Dell, as long as the failure rate can stay below an acceptable threshold (reputation issues, etc.). I've seen this with other manufacturers as well, not just Dell. Monitors and TV's, for example, were at one time individually calibrated and tested properly - those days are long gone, but they are lot cheaper today of course.
Good question. The Cometa was somewhat a “bait & switch”.
In that “group buy” gone bad was an unknown with the screen name “Cyberescudo” who was supposedly in charge. Then when it all turned to crap that person was a ghost. :person_facepalming: … No responses for the most part & about ZERO support in finding a solution. For all we know it was a “setup” from the word go by this person.
What we do have going for us in this group buy is The Miller, an upstanding, outstanding, & long standing member!
He has been upfront & transparent about everything pertaining to this group buy. He has a meticulous OP & has kept it meticulously updated as well.
As far as all that goes I personally do not see how he could have done more.
It has been and is continuing go be…… stellar. :+1:
In the very, very, very, very extremely unlikely case that this GB did somehow turn to ‘shite’, I DO NOT think The Miller would run & hide as the ‘Cyberescudo’ person did in the Cometa disaster. I think he would be leading the charge to make things right. :+1:
The Miller & the way he has handled this whole Q8 project is why I personally trust it 100%.
Having a second set of “trained eyes” look at the Q8 takes nothing away from what I have said above or from anyone else. Many times a second set of eyes will see something the first did not. This applies to anything, not just this light.
I like my Cometa very much.It is a very good light,with a good throw of 164Kcd with the original Jaxman aspherical lens which I have put on.
In my opinion, The Miller can not be demanded to make things right if this turns out to be a failure, all members of the Q8 team are thousands of miles away from where the Q8 is designed and produced, all communication is remote. There is only so much we can make happen from a distance. On top of that it is and must stay hobby for us all. I’m sure if failure occurs, he and we will do our best to turn it around into a succes, but if the effort becomes too large we will just have to accept the failure and move on.
Of course The Miller would not be responsible for failure or “making it right”.
As far as I am concerned he has done & is doing everything that is humanly possible to avoid a “failure”.
What more could he possibly do??
Nothing as far as I am concerned…….
That is not the point. The Cometa was not as promised. It was a “bait & switch”.
I like mine Ok also…… after I reworked it.
I agree that seems reasonable. Perhaps a hold it a few seconds on max to stress any really weak solder or component (if that’s any use, I’m really not sure). Then again, it’s unlikely all lights will be tested with fresh cells.
And yes, this isn’t Thorfire’s first light. The one I have from them is built just fine so I suspect they do know what they’re doing and don’t need to be bugged about every little detail.
It may not sound like much, but a quick smoke test goes a long way. Usually it’s a metaphor, but in this case it might literally be checking if smoke comes out.
In any case, if we can get a basic “does it turn on?” test before shipping, that would put the Q8 leagues ahead of previous BLF projects. And if not, it’ll probably still be okay most of the time.
You don’t work in QC, do you? 
It’s like baby-sitting 50 year olds. You would not expect Fortune 1000 companies to need that level of oversight, but they do. Small suppliers/manufacturers are sometimes very good, but often much worse.
With several hundred lights having come to me either by my own order or as a mod host I can say very few of them have had any real issues as made by the manufacturer. The HD2010 I got once upon a time was probably what started me into modding, not working right out of the box. This was an exception to the rule and I’ve seen very few lights come in that condition. So as long as Thorfire cares about their rep they won’t do slop and careless assembly. That all falls on them and there’s not much we can say other than it will not be accepted.
If indeed they turn each light on and make sure it functions then we will be in the “Good”.
Jos, I think I may need to lower the reflector a bit… 20ga leads are too thick in the Silicone wrap variety so it might take some Teflon wires that are thinner. I’ll flesh it out and see how that changes things, could only be better.
As far as QC goes, I’ve personally built hundreds of drivers… usually one at a time. I built an FET driver for my 5th scratch built light and danged if it would not work! Everything was on it correctly, everything tested, it got re-flashed and re-reflowed, nada. So I built another just like it and this one is perfect. Sometimes things just happen. The turn on and ramp up/down will show any such lemon and reject it back to the assembly line.