Yeah, the word âLanternâ might be too small there, but it can be fixed if it is decided to use this name/logo. I used a perspective tool to make that text, and it stretches the âBLFâ and squishes the âLanternâ. The fix is to start with the âBLFâ squished and the âLanternâ stretched out, so when the perspective tool is done, it still looks even. Once that is fixed, then making it 10mm high will not be a problem.
Maybe Iâm too late to chime in but I much much prefer BLF Campfire (without the âLanternâ) to keep it simple, marketable and easy to understand. BLF Lantern doesnât roll off the tongue naturally, the two Lâs are a bit cumbersome.
If this ended up being the final name, Iâd say put the logo in between SAR and Lantern. That way it would be more centered, and the rays could be equal length.
As suggested by some other members, keeping the name-string short & simple will keep costs down maybe, and going with BLF L1 keeps the name as a model designation & on que with past BLF project names, ( Q8, A6, GT, etc.) also L1 keeps the lantern open for future updated models, ( L2, L3, etc.)
so here is the name with the lantern image logo and beam graphic that many have expressed they like. Even though this name was not added to Angerdanâs poll, it seems to combine the popular voted longer name abbreviation (BLF Lantern) with a model number (1) while keeping the name string simple, short, and aligned to past BLF light projects.
I like itâŚâŚ. did you consider what it would look like if you centered the Lantern?
BLF*L1 âŚâŚ. then the âraysâ would cover the whole campsite