One layer of kapton tape was all I could fit. Any more than that and it wonât fit into the outer tube any more.
I donât know if the tail parts will be glued or not, so I donât know how easy itâll be to open. Regardless, that doesnât seem to be an issue as much as making sure the driver fits into the proper place. Proto1 and proto2 were totally fine in that regard, I never saw a proto3, and proto4 didnât have quite a large enough space cleared out for the driver.
Detailed info has been sent, but everyone there is on holiday for a while so there is no response yet.
Cool. Iâm guessing there is a retaining lip at the switch end of the tube?
Yes the driver cavity being correctly machined is quite an important aspect of this build.
I donât think there was ever an issue of the battery tube being too short. There were however instances of the driver not sitting down into the driver cavity all the way which thereby made it seem like the battery tube was too short. Maybe that is what youâre referring to. And yes, this issue has been relayed back to the manufacturer.
I must have missed this reviewerâs statement of why the batteries didnât fit. He stated that button top batteries wouldnât work, and that tightening the end cap dented them. I assumed this mean the tube needed to be lengthened, but it sounds like recessing the driver more is the real solution. Anyway, glad that it is being addressed. It would make no sense at all to produce this light in a configuration that would not accept both types of batteries.
Button top cells are still not recommended. Due to the varying legnths, some will fit and some wonât. The max recommended length is 66mm. Unprotected flat top cells should all fit, though which is why they are recommended.
Unlike a regular flashlight with a single battery tube you can use long springs to compensate for a wide range of battery lengths. This light however uses a unique dual battery tube and has a very narrow range of battery lengths.
Yes, I studied the dual-tube mechanical diagram. But I donât see anything about it that inherently requires a short-spring arrangement. As long as both the inner and outer tubes make good contact, we should be good to go, and this has no relationship to the spring length. So increasing both tubes (if necessary) by a small but equal amount, and slightly lengthening the springs, should not hurt the functionality. Am I missing something?