TCR is a subjective rating to a particular flash. Every flash is different. Hence every emitter is different. Granted, web-consensus can then become a strong or even better indicator of production consistency. This is where TCR fills a gap that CRI can’t provide.
If you think your eyes are inferior to CRI then ya shouldn’t care. Just buy watt the CRI sez and if you’re unhappy with watt ya got then ya can blame CRI, right? :student:
Looking a a few 730nm LED Datasheets a part of their spectrum are in the Visible range which would be what we would see, just like an UV LED also emits in the visible range.
Depends on the lighting and tint bin. The sw45k seems fairly tightly binned and most people would say the SW45k is pink, but it is blue compared to warmer lights or at night. I have had 3 bins of the SST-20 4000k and they range from yellow-green to white-blue-pink in tint.
Interesting. Our Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz BfS gives a range of visible light up to 780nm. Is this a mean/max thing? Or don’t I understand the photopic luminosity function (likely )?
If I was to make a guess, while those LEDs still have a significant blue spike and overall different spectral makeup than a blackbody source the difference is insignificant compared to what a lower-Ra LED or florescent would have. The latter two have HUGE gaps in the spectrum that are underrepresented vs blackbodies. Since color of an object is determined by reflected light, the slight differences in intensity of some wavelengths doesn’t matter as much for accurate color representation (since much of the light is being absorbed anyway) vs a segment/segments of the spectrum being extremely low relative the others.