Well my TF Mini-01 is confirmed brighter than the BLF Mini, but not by much. Probably driven the same, just the tint difference is the reason for the lost lumens. BLF version popped 571 lumens and the 01 blasted out 664 lumens on the same just off the charger TF Flame 16340. It drops quickly, these are just first 10 seconds figures that I give out, not the 30 second ansi crap everyone else does I mean…. I’m not going to show the light to someone and cover the light for 30 seconds before I show them how bright it is!
If that tint is green, compared to the WK26 I'd take that tint any day! Just look at how much better and natural the rocks look under the Mini's light compared to the washed out horrible light of the WK26.
I wish I’d picked one up during the group buy. Shame about the apparent tint lottery because it sounds like it’d be a nice pocket light. At the very least it’s a perfect candidate for an emitter swap (doesfoyhaveanynichiasyet).
I’ve got to admit, looking at the colour rendering on both the wall shot and the ground shot, the mini does look pretty natural to me. I’d find that quite useful compared to the cool white of the xtar, that just whites everything out.
Maybe it looks different in person? I have to say when I first looked at this thread on my work PC with newish HD spec widescreen monitors the tint really did look green. However at home on my crappy old 4:3 monitor running much lower res it looks a lot less green…
The outer part of the beam shot is clearly greenish, IMO (not color blind and I’m using large 1080p monitor) . . like most lights, harder to see tint in real life use vs. wall hunting.
The earlier questions about the GID o-ring at the lens is a good one - I added GID to my 2100 that Erik did and noticed I get a bit of green outer ring on wall shots that was never there before (2X as noticeable since it also narrower beam since ring is fatter than oem). On mine, there is clearly some green reflection from the GID ring. But I don’t notice anything in normal use even though there is some green induced into the beam.
EDIT: The pattern on mine is different, green ring is smoother and slightly inside the outer area of a beam shot. So it may be the tint or different angles.
Actually, I think these pictures show it a little less green than it looks to me in real life. I've got neutrals and I will admit being a late comer on the importance of rendering and I'm also notoriously slow to criticize tint. Call it neutral green if you want but green is what it is. Yes, it was right at dusk and I do agree that the Xtar cool white does wash out the colors, as most CW's do . . . maybe I'll put an IO neutral next to it.
However it compares, I don't like the tint. Wouldn't be the first time I was alone with my opinion. Maybe tint can sometimes be an acquired thing. I'm from Georgia so, perhaps Foy isn't cultured enough for caviar or tint.
I don’t have the BLF mini but rather the TF mini which I purchased from eBay. The white on my light is really bright. If I were to compare to any one of the lights I own in my collection I would say the same tint as my X8 only not as bright of course.
I love my mini! It has been on my key chain for about 6 months and has held up very well.
I swapped the stock XML with a NW (5000K) XML and it’s really sweet! Try running it with IMR 16340 - you will be amazed at how much light this little sucker and pump out.
I think you all are kidding yourselves with the nichia .(on a white wall).they are as pinkishly rosey as i've ever seen .All my sexy neutrals suddenly look green in comparison to the nichia..{i'm not bashing on the nichia it's a great emitter w/ a nice tint and high cri it's very nice .. but white walled it looks pinkish}
I agree with my brother Foy the tint is greenish.. not foul green.. but it's unmistakable without any other light next to it ..my first reaction was... huh ?? is this a neutral ??.. if it's really a xml 3 c ...Then i have no idea what to say .. i think it's a case of bad binning or someone assuming a neutral is just a neutral
It looks like a 2T or a 3S to me ....i agree that the cri is higher on this tint and colors are better reproduced but that doesn't mean the tint is great . I'ts not horrible for me it's just noticable ..the pwm looks like it's pretty fast ...but it still bugged me ..odd because i know i have lights with lower pwm that don't seem to bother me all that much . It does reproduce colors pretty well and on an LMR it gets pretty dang bright .It also heats up fast on high . I think it's a bit of a gimmick light it's too heavy to carry and too small to use seriously .Shape is odd and is hard to use with one hand . The beam is very floody and fairly smooth ..modes are spaced nicely...it's the size shape and weight that ruins this light ... oh yeah ...it doesn't tailstand very well :P
it was nice to have a light made ..sadly it's another case of it not being well thought out ..the host it's self was a bad idea .. just like this talk of a modified Z8... My advice is start with a solid platform . not a wacky one ..or it will also become another shelf queen and never used .