I’ve about run the gamut of computer options from mid-grade factory and 100% custom gaming desktops and from $2,000+ Macbook Pros down to sub $500 Acer laptops. I’m far from an expert on computers, but I probably know enough to be dangerous. Seems to be a side effect of being a serial tinkerer. So while I’m not an expert, I figure my most recent experiences with laptops might be helpful food for thought.
4+ years ago I bought an Acer at TigerDirect for $400 after taxes after my third $2,000 Mac (I went Powerbook G4-MacBook Pro-MacBook Pro… used for school and photo editing primarily) prematurely ended itself for some unknown reason.
My new job bought me a pretty nice HP Elitebook a little over a month ago (they’re mainly sold to business users… not a common consumer laptop. Only mentioning that b/c you won’t see one in Best Buy. I think my particular model sells somewhere around $1,800).
So because I can’t leave anything alone, my $400 Acer (came with a Sandybridge i3 and 4GB of RAM) has been very slightly upgraded with a second 4GB stick of RAM (8GB total), and a 250GB Samsung 840 SSD. Bought the SSD a while ago when they were slightly more expensive, so I’ve probably spent about $700 on the Acer in all.
This 4+ year-old Acer straight up whips my brand-new HP Elitebook that’s got a Haswell i5 in it and 16GB of RAM. Acer scores 6.3 in the Windows Experience Index vs. 4.6 for the HP. And it’s over four years old and the HP is 2.5 times more expensive. They’re both running Windows 7 Pro (64 bit), both are 15” and run the same screen resolution. Granted, the Windows Experience Index isn’t the end-all be-all comparison metric, but since they’re on the same version of Windows running the same resolution and the same sort of programs, I think it’s a convenient and fair comparison to somewhat quantify the difference in how much quicker the old Acer feels vs. the new HP. Kinda odd, but the 4.6 score from the HP stems from its graphics performance, and the Haswell generation is supposed to crush Sandybridge and Ivybridge in that regard. The HP scores marginally higher in the Processor and RAM categories (as it should). If the difference in the performance between the two was due solely to the SSD in the Acer, I would’ve expected the Primary Hard Disk score to be the lowest on the HP instead.
In more subjective terms, the HP is thinner, a little lighter and feels a ton nicer (metal keyboard surround, some soft-touch plastic on the shell vs the 100% hard plastic Acer). The HP also has backlit keys, whereas the Acer doesn’t.
That’s all to say I wouldn’t write-off budget brands entirely. Buying a computer is ALL about what you’re going to be using it for. I run a fair amount of heavy programs for work and have multiple cloud storage services running in the background which take up a lot of RAM. I don’t edit photos as much as when I was in college anymore, so I’ve been without a discrete graphics card since my last MBP died. I also use multiple external monitors about 80% of the time, but still need the mobility of a laptop for the other 20%.
So if you’re only using a computer at a desk - you’ll get a lot more for your money with a desktop. If you travel a lot, you might want a smaller/lighter laptop than a standard(ish) 1”–1.5” thick 15” screen laptop. Or get a nice shoulder bag to carry it around in.
My advice would be to figure out what you’ll be using the computer for primarily, and let that determine what features you need, then settle on a price range and try to find the best deal in that price range with the features on your list. There are way, way too many options out there to dive in without a list of must-have features. Also… get something with an SSD or put one in whatever you get. By far the biggest performance gain you can make for the money (in my humble opinion).