Hi folks this is my first post here so please excuse any transgression.
I ordered a Ganzo FH13 ( Knife Firebird by Ganzo FH13-SS online catalog ganzoknife.com, description of Knife Firebird by Ganzo FH13-SS, characteristics Knife Firebird by Ganzo FH13-SS ) from China early September. It arrived at UK Customs late September, stuck there, and I received a Notice of Seizure end of October. All the Notice says, is that the item in question is a “Flick Knife”, and that I have 30 days to appeal before ownership transfers to them.
Since I did not know if I was sent the wrong item (e.g. a Ganzo G707 is a flick knife), or UK Border Force made an incorrect assessment, I emailed them asking for further details. Today I received a photo of the FH13 by post, so I wasn’t sent the wrong knife.
As far as I can see, the FH13 is just a frame lock knife like numerous others for sale in UK. If I had wanted one, for the sake of argument, Amazon.co.uk is functionally identical, and can be delivered to to my door tomorrow.
Given the way UK Border Force is organised, they will not review the legality of the seizure without an official appeal, so I have only two options: 1) give up, let them confiscate it and get my money back from seller/Paypal, or 2) appeal the decision, which, to my surprise, will apparently mean the next thing I see is them at (Magistrate) Court. The rules are explained here:
I said I am surprised, because I would have thought pre-action protocol should exist for both sides to understand the other’s position - e.g., I do not understand why the knife is considered a “Flick Knife” - “Flick Knife” have been banned in UK for decades, yet knives just like the one I ordered are widely available in UK today.
For pre-action protocol to be dispensed with, would mean a potentially gross and unnecessary waste of court time and legal costs. This is significant, given such costs could be awarded against me if I lose an appeal.
Why could I lose? Well the legal definition of “Flick Knife” did change very recently, on 14th July 2021 to be exact, see e.g. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/offensive-weapons-knives-bladed-and-pointed-articles:
“Possession of certain prohibited knives: Section 1A Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959
(Summary offence)
This was introduced by section 44 OWA to prohibit the possession of flick knives or gravity knives. Also note the amendment to the definition of ‘flick knife’ created by section 43 OWA.- any knife which has a blade which opens automatically either from the closed position to the fully opened position, OR from a partially opened position to the fully opened position, by manual pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in or attached to the knife.”
While previously, a flick knife is “any knife which has a blade which opens automatically by hand pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in or attached to the handle of the knife”.
The change is the result of a 2018 bill. The definition’s lack of clarity (which apparently was not included in public consultation for the bill), was a subject raised by a Shadow Home Minister, see e.g. Amendments to the definition of “flick knife”: 6 Sep 2018: Public Bill Committees - TheyWorkForYou
Unfortunately, the response (by a Home Minister) was as clear as mud. For whatever reason she indicated a “thumb stud” is ok, so presumably also a “Spyderco” thumb hole, but what about a flipper tab ( https://www.bladehq.com/cat—Knife-Opening-Mechanisms—3629)?
She talked about the deployment speed being the issue, but speed is not mentioned in the legislation.
If knives with flipper tabs are considered “Flick Knife”, then all such knives would now be illegal to own, not just carry, let alone sold by Amazon UK.
Ironically, an M16 like the one I could get from Amazon tomorrow is considered by many to have popularised flippers (How did the 'Flipper' get so popular? »).