Out of the two choices I’d prefer the NON italic one.
But in my own opinion, We’re all allowed it. I know SB has chosen. But the Q8 font for the BLF/GT looked clean and simple. Lumintop keeping their own font. CE RoHS Trash BIN on the tail cap same as the final two choices.
I’d also prefer no other markings on opposite end of switch near tripod mount. With that it’s going to start getting into a certain company territory of plastering text over the whole light 
Aint worth arguing Jerommel, his project his decision… went through this when it was supposed to be easily usable with laptop pulls, he wanted mechanical polarity protection, was supposed to be an easily removable plastic disk and now it is a soldered on PCB board… wants safety but over and over again says mismatched cells are OK in this light…
I think it would look better streamlined, composed and to the point. Personally I think multiple fonts and the clutter on the bottom is going to make the already giant spectacle of a light even more gaudy, but bottom line is we have no choice…
Either way am anxious for this light
It’s a minor nitpick but the BLF on the tailcap looks squished compared to the BLF under the switch; however, there aren’t many ways to manage white space in this case so it works.
Regarding the serial number idea, would they be unique identifiers? Or something a bit more broad like “1 of 555”?
I like the bottom left, or the top one without the empty space within the letters. Why would you want a beam of dark going through our logo?
Edit: the “GT” on the tailcap should be marginally higher, all else being equal, spaces between the bolded words will look larger than it actually is, requiring less actual space compared to between the “GT” and “lumintop”.
And I’m way late so just tossing this out there. Removing “BLF” and Lumintop’s logo on the tailcap and placing Lumintop’s logo on the opposite side of the BLF/rabbit/GT logo beneath the switch would streamline the tailcap. So you’d just have a signature GT logo and import/compliance markings on the tailcap, serial number beneath the GT optional.
This is just my two cents from the peanut gallery. I’m totally happy it’s almost done.
How is this? I think it fits the GT well.
Using TA’s larger logos
Looks nice, what font is the GT letters you used?
Yes :+1:
No, i’m arguing you’re being deceptive.
Whatever.
Sb messaged me and he confirmed my suspicions.
The Ubuntu bold font is not mandatory, nor is it written in stone, it was a suggestion by SB to you when you asked for a suggestion.
.
And i don’t believe there is a deadline tomorrow either.
.
Seriously, TA, try to show some respect, or fake it for all i care, for people making an effort to come up with a nice font and nice logo’s.
Results are gonna be superimposed on the GT to be evaluated, then a choice and decisions will be made and then they go to Lumintop for evaluation.
That’s the proper way to do this and that should be obvious.
.
I’ll post some things tomorrow, it’s ridiculously late here now, must sleep…
I simply took TA’s font and coloured in the empty space in the G with microsoft paint 
Personally, the space in the T looks great, but the empty space in the G leaves something to be wanted. This also conveniently leaves a nice empty curl from the center of the G outwards. I think it is great that this style matches both Lumintop’s logo as well as the BLF SB chose - I know there is an argument over this now, but hey, if we can keep that and still make everything gel together, why not?
Hopefully this font is agreeable with most.
Can we just focus on finishing the logo for the light? 
Hey, my GT design.
Looks good on her!
Hey guys, keep on GT-ing each other, don’t deprive me of having some afternoon kicks.
The filled in G is 100x better
“BLF bunny GT” on one side, “bunny LUMINTOP” on the other.
No one said it had to all be in only one place.
Print out and include a bunch of stickers with all the discussed logos. Let people slap on whichever ones they want, wherever on the light they want.
See? Problem solved.
Thanks, hopefully TA agrees, since he’s the one making the final call.