Well……the reflector is slightly bigger, 124.1mm versus 118 as in the BLF GT.
The bigger the reflector, the more impact those few extra millimeters have on the throw capacity.
If the XHP35 HI (latest binning) is driven hard it would do around 150cd/mm2.
With a 124mm reflector the light could reach above 1.4Mcd.
Banggood shows the MF02 as 72mm. An ad on Aliexpress shows the MT35 with a 73mm reflector. Plenty of people own the MT35 and MF02 so we know it’s 72mm.
Are you trying to make the point that the MF04 reflector size might be different than the specs once it comes to market? That is always a possibility.
if they have overstated the size of an existing flashlight, the MF04 / MT35 Plus reflector id can also be overestimated
the diameter of the head is similar to the BLF GT (+ 1mm), but maybe it is more frameless
It does look good but let’s be realistic here: The BLF GT was to have 1.290.000Cd (and is still being advertised with this throw number) but looking at the real world actual throw measurements here, including my own, most perform around 1.150.000Cd.
Still very good, but 10 - 11% less then advertised.
.
If the same goes for the upcoming Astrolux, the promised 1,460.000Cd will translate to around 1.300.000Cd.
It COULD reach over 1.400.000Cd, but then everything has to be perfect: driver, led centering & focus, top bin led, reflector quality, heat management, etc……….
Do you mean 1,46 million “Astrolux” candela? I believe it when I see it.
They promised 2700/3000 lumen and 630kcd at the specs of MF02. The reality is 2,2k lumen and 420 kcd.
You sad it well. That GT (VOB’s ? ) which can throw 1.290.000Cd is a well succeed piece. For example ZozzV6’s GT can reach 981kcd. The difference is just two Emisar D1S (~2*130kcd).