✌ FREEME - ASTROLUX MF04S (XHP70.2) & MF04 (XHP35 HI) - BRASS@.@

Any improvement on your lux reading after the adjustment?

So 2.08km is the new reference for beam tuning? :smiley:

Is it possible to show the Nw and Cw version against that tower?

interested

Reference

NW

CW

At almost 2 miles it is difficult to tell the difference in the color, the cool white just seemed a bit brighter. One was a stock light I purchased for my Son-in-Law, the other was mine with the emitter swapped.

All 3 images were taken with the Canon 5D MkIV on a tripod, same settings of f/4, 0.5 sec exposure, ISO 1600 at 125mm through a EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS lens.

With their 124mm reflector, the Mateminco MT-35 and it’s corresponding Astrolux should equal or exceed what I saw in my GT.

For this,I’ ve got a 65m laser distance meter,so as to test GT at 50m. :wink:

Thanks very interesting.

Thanks very interesting.

Do you remember if you’re cool white emitter was a higher bin compared to the stock D4 bin neutral white?

Cw did appear more clearly on the tower. Well that must be due to higher bin led.

I don’t want to assume. I just can’t remember if Dale used the same bin or a higher one. Plus with Cree’s binning method you can have up to 14% difference in output among the same bin number.

It could also be that the CW light had a slightly smoother finish on the reflector or a slightly better focus.

I think he had more details in the GT thread, but I cant find it.

I got the highest reading at 1.061 Mcd (2.06km) at 15m.

interested please add me

Interested!

Interested, please add me. Thanks :slight_smile:

Welcome to all new members. Your names have been added to our list.

Interested, please add me. Thanks Smile

Interested

Interested