It would be nicer if the price is $100 for 70.2 version.
Im alittle concern no review yet and there are possibilities problems with the lights.
still waiting for tint of….
WW = ?
NW = ?
CW = ?
I second this post!!
From the GB thread.
Would love to see some pic’s of the light tore down. Specifically LED shelf thickness, driver pocket depth, driver for the XHP70 and the 35, wondering if both XHP70/XHP35 builds are the same?
Yes
I can not forget what happened in the first GB HaikeLite MT03 & MT07 Group-buy Closed
I hope they have improved that does not happen again
For now I have not decided
Oh my…. :person_facepalming:
How many kcd could the xhp35 version throw?
“Similar” to Acebeam x65, which can 430kcd and 12k lumens. That has 108 mm head and there are 3 leds next to each other. MT09R has 74 mm head and there are 2 leds next to each other. So both of them have same width of “mini reflectors”. Another question is the depth of these reflecrtors.
Would you are satisfied with 250kcd? 
I will probably wait until more reviews come out… or the price goes down. Hope the light is a success!
After the group buy, prices only go up.
For the quality vs price, there will be a code a year from now I was wanting a Blue one but not paying the asking price for a Haikelite. Its more then the GT! Haikelite does not have a good track record for quality. I’m sure they will get there though :+1:
Can someone explain me what is TA driver? TA Driver , Current regulation on Low Low > Low> Medium>High ;
It stands for Texas Avenger which is designed by our own Texas_Ace BLF member. They are bad a$$ drivers.
Thanks man. I am kind of new here. Lol…
So blf q8, emisar d4/d1, and blf gt use narsil ???
What is the differenxe between narsil and TA driver ??
No, Narsil and NarsilM are firmware or software.
The Q8 uses NarsilM v1.0.
The GT uses NarsilM v1.2.
The Emisar D4/D1 use IOS Ramping. It’s similar to Narsil, but it can’t do as much. No mode sets for instance (low, med, high, etc) it’s ramping only. Plus some of it’s features are a bit different.
The TA driver is the hardware. The actual printed circuit board with all the components on it. It’s pretty fancy and has a lot of memory storage for a big firmware like Narsil. It will also run many other firmwares like Bistro and many others.
From beamshot, I think it is around 200kcd. That’s why I choose not to order yet.
200kcd would be very disappointing. Do you think it’s at all likely that the XHP35 can actually do 7500 lumens?
Those are estimated LED lumens. I think OTF lumens is around 6000 lumens for short time.
Ok, I am waiting for a sample review. I hope it will happen before the closing of group buy.
I’m interested -
A question - will the CW 70.2 version generate a few more lumens than the NW version?
For this light next purchase, I’m tryingb to decide between this and the Imalent dt70, as they are selling same price. Lots of info and reviews out the for the dt70, not so much on this one yet.
I like the idea that the dt70 is a bit smaller in form. However, I’m assuming the newer 70.2 emitters will be way more efficient in power drain (also three versus four).
Any thoughts on a comparison between these two lights?
Thanks