Bort
July 21, 2012, 1:33am
27
NightCrawl:
Bort:
1. Can I test for voltage sag under load?
2. Two others who have tested this light with eneloops got 1.9 amps, does this mean the AMCs are splitting it equally, or does it mean only some of them are operating?
3. I am curious because if we assume both of their lights work correctly and this is the capability of the eneloops, if I get 1.6 or 1.8 amps with them would it suggest an AMC failure, or would it still be 1.9 if one or two failed since that would be less then the difference between 1.9 and 2.8 that the driver should be pulling?
1. You can. You need to disassemble the light, connect the cells with magnets and add some leads. Now install the leads of the DMM to read the voltage of all 4 cells in series -> should give you about 6V. If you now connect this setup to the pill, it will light up and the voltage will sag to somewhere around 3.5V.
2. They dont work at all, the light basically goes direct drive.
3. The driver doesnt pull anything, the LED does. The driver just regulates it, because XMLs can pull 5A or more from good cells. By building a driver in, you limit it to 2.8A (in this case).
Now LEDs do have a forward voltage. They wont light up below a certain voltage and this voltage determines current draw. The higher the voltage, the higher the current draw. But its very inaccurate, thats why AMC-baseds drivers are so popular. They regulate the current and let the forward voltage determinate itself.
no scientific explanation, but thats how I understood it and it works out in real-life applications
So, would it be correct to say that the amperage for eneloop batteries is sagging under the current draw to the led lower limit and thats what setting the 1.9 to 2amp draw limit?
Since the light uses 3 batteries in series, would using 4 batteries allow more current to flow, less sagging on each?
Would trying this damage the led or driver since it has a 4.5volt limit?
http://www.intl-outdoor.com/amc71358-5mode-circuit-board-nanjg-105c-p-216.html
I know i’m asking complicated questions that may be hard to answer
Boaz
(Boaz)
July 21, 2012, 3:30am
28
I'd grab a tr01 for under 10$ and rip apart that lap top battery pack .unless you have a real dud then there are going to be probably 5 decent cells in it . meanwhile i'd order a few decent batteries and wait on those .
I assume there are only a few bad cells screwing up the entire pack that's normally the case ..buy a tr01 from T mart or someone who will ship it fast and then you can wait on the rest .
Bort
July 21, 2012, 4:21am
29
Boaz:
I’d grab a tr01 for under 10$ and rip apart that lap top battery pack .unless you have a real dud then there are going to be probably 5 decent cells in it . meanwhile i’d order a few decent batteries and wait on those .
I assume there are only a few bad cells screwing up the entire pack that’s normally the case …buy a tr01 from T mart or someone who will ship it fast and then you can wait on the rest .
I re-read my posts, i did write it a bit confusingly, the laptop batteries are maybe 5 years old and at 100% charge (4.2V) only hold 40% of what they did when new.
I am planning to buy some new 18650 or 26650 batteries with a decent charger, but i have not decided what is the best value, i don’t mind spending a bit more, but i have to careful about cost. I am currently considering the sanyo 18650 from intl outdoor, unless someone has better suggestions.
Bort:
So, would it be correct to say that the amperage for eneloop batteries is sagging under the current draw to the led lower limit and thats what setting the 1.9 to 2amp draw limit? Since the light uses 3 batteries in series, would using 4 batteries allow more current to flow, less sagging on each? Would trying this damage the led or driver since it has a 4.5volt limit? http://www.intl-outdoor.com/amc71358-5mode-circuit-board-nanjg-105c-p-216.html I know i’m asking complicated questions that may be hard to answer
Voltage is sagging, not amperage. 4 cells would give you more current draw, yes. Normally no problem for the driver, low mode might be critical tho.
Well, those Sanyos from IO are unprotected. If you are OK with that, there are cheaper sources.. for that price you can get them protected.
Bort
July 22, 2012, 12:06am
33
I very much dislike ebay, bad experiences
Hikelite
(Hikelite)
August 25, 2012, 5:26am
34
Buy good Li-ion cells, then try to measure. And simply buy thick leads and eliminate the possibility of the leads adding to much resistance.
Don't go for the cheapest, these are very good: http://www.intl-outdoor.com/2-pcs-sanyo-ur18650fm-2600mah-protected-battery-p-516.html
Intl-Outdoor UR18650FM 2600mAh (Black)
[image]
Official specifications:
Sanyo 18650 Protected Battery
Protected against Overdischarge, Overcharge and Short-circuit
Capacity: 2600mAh
Recommended Max Discharge: 5.2A (2C)
Full charge: 4.2V
Nominal voltage: 3.7V
Cut-off: 2.75V
[image]
[image]
[image] [image]
[image]
[image]
[image]
This battery has a high voltage at low loads.
[image]
[image]
[image]
[image]
[image]
[image]
Conclusion
The high v…
Bort
August 25, 2012, 5:30am
35
How ironic you replied to this old thread just now, the cells i ordered arrived today, and like i posted in the what you got today thread, still no dice, 2.44 on high, 0.75 medium, 0.11 low
Hikelite
(Hikelite)
August 25, 2012, 5:32am
36
Bort:
Hikelite:
Buy good Li-ion cells, then try to measure. And simply buy thick leads and eliminate the possibility of the leads adding to much resistance.
Don't go for the cheapest, these are very good: http://www.intl-outdoor.com/2-pcs-sanyo-ur18650fm-2600mah-protected-battery-p-516.html
Test / Review: Intl-Outdoor UR18650FM 2600mAh (Black)
How ironic you replied to this old thread just now, the cells i ordered arrived today, and like i posted in the what you got today thread, still no dice, 2.44 on high, 0.75 medium, 0.11 low
I simply did not read this thread until today.
So you got the Marsfire?
Hikelite
(Hikelite)
August 25, 2012, 5:38am
38
I see, then those cells should have no problem regarding resistance. Try cleaning the threads of the flashlight and use thick leads.
Bort
August 25, 2012, 5:43am
39
already done, i took the pill out and used several layers of wire before i accepted those as the final numbers
Hikelite
(Hikelite)
August 25, 2012, 5:48am
40
Try changing the driver and see if that brings any change. Or you can take the driver out and test it separately out of the pill but still connected to an XM-L.
I'm really curious of this.
Bort
August 25, 2012, 6:00am
41
I have no other drivers, this is my first foray into xm-l territory, the next newest led technology i have is from 2008 (an xp-e)
Hikelite
(Hikelite)
August 25, 2012, 6:05am
42
You should buy some other Nanjg 105C and try to see what's going on.
Bort
August 25, 2012, 6:10am
43
i’m not so impressed by these 105c drivers, not sure i want to buy any more of them, i wonder if one of the 7135 chips is defective
Hikelite
(Hikelite)
August 25, 2012, 6:16am
44
I am actually very impressed with these drivers, owning several and having seen only good remarks about them (expect one).
Hikelite
(Hikelite)
August 25, 2012, 6:19am
45
Let's say one does not work, 350mAx7 = 2450mA, 30% = 735mA, 5% = 122.5mA