Then these results seem good to me, considering the dedoming process required to get the same intensity as 719A reduces lumen… So 719A would be throwier than 519A. And we can get to use 5000k and 5700k, and boost driver for a single led, single battery flashlight… Not bad!
It may not be revolutionary but this seems to achieve what a lot of us were hoping for with b35am. Is the voltage curve higher than for b35am?
I just saw a new Convoy on AliExpress with the 719A and decided to check here.
I’m only a step above muggle level and have never tried to dedome anything.
So for someone who just wants to light up a reasonably large yard with pretty light–balancing throw and flood with a decent reflector, like on the M26C–how might this one stack up against a GT-FC40 or XHP70.3 HI at 2700, 3000, or 3500K?
I’d wait for it to show up in a different flashlight.
I have an older M26C with XHP70.2 at 3000K. It does not have mode selection, is stuck with mode memory, has a defect in the lowest mode, and the light could be prettier. However, it wonderfully bathes the scenery with light and remains a favorite choice for both hiking the fields and forest edge at night and looking for critters in the dark.
I want to do that with a prettier emitter, high CRI, choice of mode group, and the ability to turn off memory mode.
What I really like about the 719A over a dedomed 519A or the new high-CRI SFT40s is that it forces the use of a boost driver in lights that might otherwise be linear or FET. There’s often a considerable improvement to efficiency as a result.
Indeed, and I like it for dual fuel drivers because it’s easier to make a high power 6V boost only driver than one that need to both step up and step down. There’s the XHP35 but NiMH to 12V is a bit less efficient, it has a larger LES and 719A has better tint consistency and tint shift.