I ordered one today, will let ya know the tint & performance when it gets here.
Linkage to the Gold one, $4.24
Sometimes I think the China vendors use the Death Valley Days, 20-Mule Team for shipping
I ordered one today, will let ya know the tint & performance when it gets here.
Linkage to the Gold one, $4.24
Sometimes I think the China vendors use the Death Valley Days, 20-Mule Team for shipping
The lens looks flatter than that of an SK68. That would make it have a smaller spot but less light in the spot. Otherwise it seems a style variant.
I got both a black (Walbuys) and gold (ebay) one. Both have 3 modes and plastic lens. They really focus down to a tight hot spot. They are pretty neat compact zoomies.
Any pics of one next to an SK-68 clone?
Mind that those shallow lenses give beautiful tight hotspots but the throw does not impress...
Can someone measure throw compared to a sk68?
I have one of the gold ones on order. Iāll do a comparison to an SK68 when I get it.
djozz wrote:
Mind that those shallow lenses give beautiful tight hotspots but the throw does not impress...
Can someone measure throw compared to a sk68?
Chloe wrote:
Any pics of one next to an SK-68 clone? ^^
Not at the moment. I can take one tonight.
As far as the clip on the SK68 goes does it function if removed and are the screws flush when tightened down w/out the clip? I canāt seem to find any good pics of this. The review I found kind of gives an odd angle and not assembled.
Edit: Found a thread where the clip screws tighten down into the threadsā¦ Not sure if that is with or without the clip. I guess the screws could be filed down.
Couldn't pull up BLF last night to post this. I have the numbers written at home, but these should be close based on memory. I will double check tonight. I used an unprotected Sanyo 14500 cell for all the measurements. I'm calling the light "Slim" for lack of a better name.
Slim Gold - 4.4kcd at .47 amps - Lens diameter 18mm
Slim Black - 6.2kcd at .63 amps - Lens diameter 18mm
SK68 ranged from 9.5kcd to 10.8kcd. 10.8kcd was at 1.2 amps - Lens diameter 23mm
Clip does not screw on. It stays in place via a ring that is clamped between the body and the cap. The o-ring holds it nicely to the cap when the cap is off the body.
The SK68 caps fit the Slim lights, but not the other way around due to counter sink on SK68 body.
Sorry for the blurry pics. I set to macro mode. I think that is the wrong mode for the distance of most of the shots.
Slim beam on the right.
Thanks ImA4wheelr, this is what it is all about at blf: research to the bone on lights that cost almost nothing .
This gives insight in the performance. So if the 'slim' would be upgraded to 1.2A the throw would more or less match the throw of the sk68, with a smaller hotspot.</p>
That sounds about right to me, but you know way more than me about this stuff. I don't know if the different emitters have different efficiencies. I think the SK68 emitter XRE? has a narrower, more concentrated beam pattern.
I got what seems like a nice glass 18mm lens from ebay for cheap, but it doesn't work in the "Slim" (does this light have a real name?) because it's focal length is pretty short.
yes, the XRE is a bit narrower than the xpe, but not that much, and if both emitters are Q5 bin, they should be just as efficient. The XRE tends to be a bit cooler tinted than the xpe in most cases.
If you manage to get the new lens a bit closer to the led one way or another (sanding a bit off the head-tube perhaps?) it could focus well. You'll get more flood, a bigger hotspot, but about the same throw.
Updated post 29 with the numbers I had written down at the time. No real change, but wanted to have the actual numbers documented. I really like the light because it's so easy to carry. Next mode memory isn't too bad in a 3 mode light, but I would like to get rid of that. Also need to drop a Nichia 119 H1 in his baby.
Someone should do a review on the light when they get one. I just have too much going on at the moment.
I bought a black single mode one for $3 (auction) on ebay. Happy with it so far. It is slightly dimmer then SK68 but has a nicer beam, it focuses to a tighter spot and flood beam is smooth and very wide - 1.5-2 times wider than SK68 (depends on SK68 model). The zoom mechanism was very loose - the head would slide a bit under itās own weight if pointed up or down. Adding a layer of teflon tape under the o-ring on the pill fixed it. It accepts 14500 but doesnāt get any brighter on it.
Bought two black from Wallbuys, real jeans pocket edc size. Mine are brighter with 14500 but not as Sipik. Like the size and will use it.
I bought 2 of these from WB also when they had them on sale for $2 each. The tint is more of a purple/blue and itās not brighter than my SK-68 clones. Also, the beam is a little ringy when zoomed out. I really like this thing. I checked the tail cap current and got 900mA on high and 200mA on med/low with a 14500. Also, mine resets to high after a while.
I also got 2 black. I tried AA in oneā¦ dimmest light in collection. With 14500 theyāre actually worth the $1.99 (echoing, no where near Sk68).
I like the easily removable clip too. Having to file down the screws for the SK68 clip was tedious (unsure if the clip will even be able to be put back on now).
> nowhere near the SK68
Only problem I have with the SK68 is overheating if I try leaving it on (like to work under the house on wiring or plumbing).
So if these are cooler as well as dimmer, itād be worth having.
SK 68 3 modes on low donāt overheat, but small size is a big advantage. I also have on order two more SK 58s. SK 68s are probably OK left on high if you avoid burning your hand. They have a lot of cooling area, well shaped fins and they heat up uniformly, shoeing the heat distribution is good.