Got my T4 from BG yesterday. 13 days after I ordered it.
Works nicely.
Nicely built and anodizing. Was not able to get the tailcap off with strap wrenches. :/ The tailcap edges are a bit sharp on my light, and if you hold the light with a good and tight grip it can feel a but uncomfortable. I find that a bit annoying. I notice it just by picking it up.
My light does not have the "off/on twist sign" below the on/off button. I like the cleaner look.
Switch. No need to take it out, but it looks like this.
T4 reflector (left) vs regular quad reflector (right) from kung, 4 XM-L SRK etc..
I like the size, not sure how I like it in real life yet, or how it compares with a kung as I have not used the light outdoors, or compared them. The beam is not round and smooth along the edges. A typical triple emitter looks much smoother and rounder.
Crappy super CW XM-L. Lots of thermal paste, and a bit of dirty looking.
Made a larger hole on the top of the driver circuit in order to get it out. After its been out the first time, its easy to get it out. Looks like its the same driver as in the T3.
Parasitic drain in standy: 143,7 Microamps (could be lower, but its not bad)
PWM high: 0.12KHz
PWM Medium: 15.45 KHz
PWM Low: 15.45 KHz
Not sure what to make of the PWM reading on high, its not noticeable on a fan or anything. In comparison. The warrior have no noticeable PWM on high either, but easily noticeable PWM on low if pointed towards a fan or something. With the 15.45 KHz PWM on the T3 and T4 Im not able to notice it, and with that frequency I doubt anyone will. Nice!
With NCR18650B @ 4,05V emitter amps (on one of them) look like this:
2,7A
1,04
0,05
The mode spacing is quite good. Better than most of the alternatives. About 35-40% on medium and 1,5-2% on low. Its not easy to say for sure, because output on high was sinking fast towards 2,6A but it started higher than 2,7A with the cells I used.
Considering that its got 4 emitters, this is "hot-rod territory" from the factory. It heats up fast.
UI is almost the same as on the Warrior, but with one switch. Others have covered the UI already. Still, I like the UI better on the warrior due to having two switches and startup in low. But this have a lower low. Would really prefer to see it start in low instead of high, and have instant on instead of the momentary stuff.
I would prefer to have a bit knurling on the body, and also see the same lanyard attachment as the Warrior (built into the side of the body). That would also make it shorter.
The "000" resistor have a little bit resistance. Shorting them with a wire can increase peak output with around 10-20%.
With shorted resistors and LG HE2 im looking at peak output of 3,6A to each emitter (sinks quickly).
Uses 55mm lens, so it can easily be swapped with common AR lens for SRK.
Have not tested behavior with low voltage yet.
Conclusion:
This is a nice and very bright hard driven light with bad tint (not bad if you like 8000K or cooler). Emitter swap is highly recommended unless you are into very CW tint.
There are several things to nitpick on, but I can nitpick on several things on all its rival alternatives too. Considering the price. Around 30$ for a well built quad light.