Test post for review: is this format ok?

Off-topic Chatter
1

THIS IS JUST A TEST
_

A6

Reviewer’s Overall Rating: ?

“picture

Summary:

Battery:

L-Ion 18650*

Switch:

Reverse Click

Modes:

Five (High, Medium, Low, Strobe, SOS)*

LED Type:

T6

Lens:

Glass

Tailstands:

Yes (with lanyard)

Price Paid (shipping additional):

$23 (inc. retail box, battery, charger, manual and lanyard)

From:

Received:

November 2012

IPX Rating:

Yes: IP67

* Strobe and SOS modes are at 100%

Pros:

  • “STUFF TO WRITE”

Cons:

  • “STUFF TO WRITE”

"STUFF TO WRITE"

2

I guess its more than ‘okay’. Very neat arrangement.

3

Thanks for the reply Infinite but it’s NOT my original neat arrangement (thanks to all of the BLF’ers that posted in the past: I just went into the html from some of - what I thought - were the BEST reviews here and copied and edited and hoped it would look good for the standards here.

Appreciatively, m

4

Checked out your collection from your sig link:

Nice range! Thanks again!!!

5

Maybe you are able to clone a good standard structure for “Stuff to write” too. I guess there exist a lot of good basic approaches you can integrate.

6

That’s a good template to follow.
Looks very nice.

7

Yeah, as I said it’s not original (tried to look in the code posted by previous BLF’ers).

Still really gun-shy bout posting a review here considering all of the experts, but I just may now give it a try!

Thanks for your positive response fartybum! (but gotta’ play with the lights for a while longer before I’ll feel comfortable reviewing…)

8

It looks overall very similar to the template that our very own admin or xP.1337 made.

9

Yes I agree Vectrex this is not original code and wrote before in several posts that I only copied what I saw from previous posts from what I thought were the best reviews. I know this is not original but want to know if it’s acceptable?