The tern unacceptable is where I'm having trouble .
Lots of things I think are a bad idea but a long press to turn a Skillhunt H2 off isn't going to make me not love a great light .
There is this delicate dance of deciding whether a light is even worth the time, effort or the parts to fix it. Indeed, there is a long list of things that will make you pick up one light over another and clearly manufactures need to know what users dislike. Sadly, I think they know, don't care or are so obtuse that telling them isn't even going to matter.
For me since I dislike clips, it’s have them fitted rather than loose in the box. Pretty sure anyone with half a brain cell can put a clip on, sadly it’s quite difficult to remove them without causing damage to the finish and they are usually already scratched from the maker putting it on in the first place.
I also don’t appreciate engraving all over them with useless info and often bs - especially on copper lights.
This monstrosity from Manker is a good example, it’s not even aligned properly. Then there’s all the guff on the other side which has no need to be there, and more than likely isn’t true anyway.
A masterclass on how to deface a nice light, and the sole reason I didn’t buy one.
Yeah, when you’re operating from home, there’s really no big deal using a dedicated charger. I have a Fenix ARE-D2 that’s terrific (small 2-bay, versatile, quick or slow as needed). I find built-in charging best when “in the field,” or traveling. My Sofirn SP33v3, Skilhunt HC03 RC, NiWalker ET Mini V2, Sofirn SC1, and Sofirn LT1 all do a good job of not overcharging. Even the little charger attachment for the GT Nano does a good job. All of these built-in chargers are slow relative to my ARE-D2, and I like that (easier on the cells).
.
indeed, you’d think the Chinese would do a bit of market research before coming up with their brand names…. there are some hilarious ones out there for sure!
I don’t know… but how hard is it to simply consult an English speaking person who knows just a little marketing? Anyone with even half-sense would give a thumbs down on these names.
Yeah, that’s one I’d forgotten to mention — brightness progression starting from HIGH then stepping down to LOW. It’s not only far more common to need lower modes first, starting in the highest mode can cause eye trauma of one isn’t careful.
:laughing:
indeed, you’d think the Chinese would do a bit of market research before coming up with their brand names…. there are some hilarious ones out there for sure!