First impressions / mini review: Palight T6 (not mobile-friendly)

First of all, I'd like to apologize for being brief. As usual, things are a bit hectic but I wanted to share some first impressions of the Palight T6 I received from DD yesterday.

I haven't even fully inspected it, so I guess it's too soon to do even a mini review. If you guys have any questions, I'd be happy to try and answer them to the best of my ability.

Anyway, let's get started, shall we?

I usually don't care much about packaging (with the possible exception of Amazon's frustration-free packaging, which I like). As long as it protects what I really care about, it has done its job, as far as I am concerned.

Well, someone in DD's shipping department deserves a pat on the back. There are two minor dings on the tailcap, which may or may not come from fact that the tailcap was loose inside the small box. It looks like someone tested the light and shoved the tailcap in there as sort of an afterthought.

Well, I'm not complaining. This is a budget light and I expect to get plenty of use out of it, so it's bound to get scratched up a bit anyway. Ordered 9/18, received 10/6.

There are two springs and as you can see, it comes in a configuration designed for two 18650s.

The body tube does come apart but there's no lube anywhere on the extension and even though you can use it as a single-cell light, it's clearly not meant to be used that way. After turning on in high mode, it goes to low on a single 18650 in a matter of half a second. Attempting to switch modes only results in half a second of high mode, followed by the driver going back into low mode. It's not particularly useful this way, as this light is first and foremost a thrower, but I guess, in a pinch, it's nice to have at least some light

With the extension tube installed, it takes two 18650s and all of my protected batteries seem to fit just fine. There are o-rings in all the usual places and the light will headstand, as well as tailstand, even with the lanyard in place (albeit not as securely as I'd like).

Ah, there's another couple of minor dings. The light itself feels solid and substantial, but not too heavy. I don't have a scale, a caliper or a DMM or much of anything flashlight-related on my person at the moment, so I can't really tell you much more. The memory takes its sweet time to kick in: unless you wait 15-20 seconds to click the light back on again, it will come on in the next mode. Mode order is high - mid - low - blindingly bright and ridiculously fast, sweet-mother-of-Hyperion-are-you-kidding-me strobe, SOS (which is actually SOOS, unless my tired eyes deceive me... yeah :D).

The knurling looks and feels nice, but doesn't add much grip. As you'd expect, the light throws quite well. Unfortunately, I don't have anything to compare it to at the moment: all my other lights, with the exception of a Solarforce l2m and the light on my keychain are at home and, well, I am not. I think I'll leave you guys with some more pictures and try to update this thread later.

If you have any questions, ask away. :)

Why does the glass look dirty on all DD lights. I have this same problem with my Ultrafire C8 XML. It looks like it's pitted. Maybe it's not real glass.

Still waiting for my Palight T6

With springs at both ends my bet is that in shortie configuration it will handle both two 16340's or two 18350's. I doubt it will then switch to low as it is doing with a single 18650.

Some kept saying here that this flashlight is the same with OTR X5. From the pictures the finish doesn't look that good as the OTR X5. X5's tube is nicer. With only one battery goes to low.... so not 1 cell thrower, I've heard that X5 might not be good because it can't take 1 cell like the Palight T6.

And look at the internals, this one is messy, has a spring, and a copper pill. The X5 doesn't have a spring or a copper pill.

This Palight T6 looks on the outside like the OTR X381.

Update: most images are now clickable for full-resolution shots.

And just to clarify: this is how the flashlight came out of the box. I haven't had a chance to clean or lubricate anything yet. That's why you can see metal shavings in one of the close-ups. Still, at this point in time, I think this light is a good deal. You can probably tell I'm a bit hesitant because I haven't used it for more than half an hour and haven't had much of chance to make up my mind. But, so far and for what it is, I like it.

I would say it's at least not from the same manufacturer because we know who makes the OTR lights and they're tight on their quality control.

Sorry, that must be me! Tongue out

Yeah, i'd definitely say with the OTR X5 beside me, that is absolutely a day-and-night difference, the OTR X5 is perfect. Anyway the OTR X5 is way more expensive if you get it by its own and don't "share" shipping + w/o a discount.

The OTR X5 also has a massive and very weighty drop-in (mass to absorb the heat even if you are in the tropics).

But hey, i think it'd still perform. Someone pls get some figures. :)

Driver/drop-in is different, definitely.

asd

55mm head & 57mm head

You were not alone, 2100. I too made the mistake of thinking the Palight T6 was the same as the X5 and was an advocate of it. I didn't even know that there was a very similar looking but slightly smaller light on the market. Sorry folks.

A couple more pictures and some updates. Summer from DD requested that I add a link to their store and considering that this was a group buy, I'm happy to oblige.

I disassembled the light to inspect it, and noticed that the reflector wasn't screwed all the way down.

So, naturally, after I tightened everything back into place, I was left with this (note the gap).

And this is what it sounds like...

http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/9BAvVmbfs-8?rel=0

I suppose it's nothing an extra o-ring can't fix, but since I'm not at home and don't make it a habit to carry spares with me, I had to unscrew the reflector a bit to fix the annoying rattle. This is probably something the manufacturer should address in the future.

The light on high. All I have at the moment is my cell phone camera, which doesn't have an option to disable AWB. ISO 100, F2.8, 1/111s.




Drop-in amount of threads look ok. Should perform if LED is driven at full power. Lots of mass for heatsinking.

I have received my light today. I also have the same issues as Oxy Moron.

The glass lens is too small at 51mm needs to be 52mm, also needs to be couple of mm thicker.

My light came with no bubble warp. The tail cap was loose in the box this is because the box is too small, that's why they don not attach the tail cap.

The light only pulls 1Amp(High) 0.50Amp(Med) and 0.04Amp(Low).

Memory mode is perfect, you only have to wait 1-2 seconds.

There is a pre-flash when you start it on Low mode.

Oxy Moron how many Amps is your light pulling?

That is a good question. I only measured high, and I think I got 1.7ish A.

I loaned mine out to a friend and I should have it back sometime next week. Mine exhibits the same behavior on low, btw.

Can anyone tell me what Amps should I get at the tail-cap for the LED to get 3Amps?

Should I get a reading of 1.5Amps therefore I get 3Amps at the LED.

Right now I get 1 to 1.06Amps at the tail-cap, so is the LED getting 2 - 2.12Amps?

Yeah, actually you're more interested in watts (the power) rather than voltage or current

w = V x A, so if you double the tailcap voltage, halve the current.

At 1.06A @ 8.4v (dual fresh 18650s), you're still talking about about 8.5w of power, vs. ~12.5w for a 'hard driven' XML... From the spec sheets, it looks like you're losing about 20% of your emitter lumens in exchange for 50% longer runtime.

Does it mean that the light is making 850Lm?

100lm per Watt?

Match did some testing a while back, and the (relevant) results would be:

2A: 686 lumens

3A: 881 lumens

(you can see the results over here)