Triple XM-L P60?

Just wondering if the parts exist to build one? I know it could never be driven hard due to the heat but I wonder how it would do with output and heat sag when splitting 3A (1A to each emitter) vs, 3A to a single XM-L? Just looking at Match's XM-L testing I'm seeing 392.1@1A which gives a total 1176.3 emitter lumens with 3 emitters vs. 881.4 for a single XM-L driven at 3A. I'd also have to assume there would be less heat generated and less output sag due to the emitters being more efficient at lower current.

Am I missing something here?

Thanks,

Tony

It would seem like the physical limitations of the P60 diameter would be the biggest barrier. Just not enough space. But I would definitely buy one if they somehow figured it out! :)

well there's a triple xp-g p60 drop-in..xm-l's are a bit bigger but not a staggering difference..i'm sure it could be done and i'd love to have one lol

$148 for the triple XP-G! Wow! Sounded real good until I saw that price!

-Garry

It would be interesting, but really you are not going to notice a huge difference between 1100 emitter lumens and 800 emitter lumens, not enough IMO to justify the large price difference.

How close are we talking pounder? Could I reflow XM-Ls onto a star intended for 3 XP-Gs? I'd be willing to try this if I could source the parts. Right now I'm seeing the star and optics as being the big issues. The driver I have on hand and I'm pretty sure I could come up with a reasonable copper heat sink out of plumbing bits from the hardware store.

But imagine the "turbo" mode. If we could find the right driver with a time or heat limited turbo mode you'd have a very bright light with a few seconds of insanity at a time and all that wrapped in a P60 size package.

Edit: also there seems to be a large amount of sag in output as heat builds up with a hard driven single XM-L. I'm hoping that driving each emitter easier so they're more efficient would help with that.

True, good point.

Optics would be the immediate issue, as there would be little room for three reflectors of adequate diameter.

A smaller version of the Ledil Cute 3-up optic would need to be cast.

Let me see if the XPG 3-up version can be enlarged to accommodate the XML. Of it works, then it's only about $150USD to have a custom MPCB made.

that I wouldn't know..I doubt you could use an xm-l with an xp-g star..i've been out of the xp-g game so long and I just took a look at xp-g vs xm-l..it's a bigger difference than I once thought..I imagine you could get 3 of them on a p60 board but it would be tight..

Nice! if the XP-G optics can be made to work, there are some tiny carclo triples that might work really well.

Oh well, it was a thought. I wonder if the contacts on the bottom of the leds could be insulated somehow to allow them to be reflowed directly to a piece of copper and then solder the wires to the contacts on top? That or as Chicago X mentioned, a custom MPCB could be made but @ $150 for the custom MPCB that kills the possibility of keeping it budget.

the other day I was looking at chicago-x's extreme long run triple xml mod and wondering what three emitters behind a FTT setup would look like. then i realized - TERRIBLE - so I stopped wondering

The XP-G triple optics I have are right out. The whole thing is far too small.

The triple XM-L optics already have a 'blended' area in the center to accommodate the three XM-Ls. Sizing is already tight.

One could:

* Stack FOUR XM-Ls together, as closely as possible on a piece of copper. A single TIR lens that covers the bundle could be used.

* Same, but use an aspheric. See the Feilong CSM-360 for approximate beam shape.

* Grind the optic and board down slightly for use in a larger M-series head - this would be my approach.

It would require a modification of the Cutter series-wired board (32mm), or more grinding on the individually-addressable German board (35mm).

One cannot grind down the setup too much without losing the centering posts either.

I talked to cutter about 3 x XM-L , on one of there 3 x XP-G boards ..

Sounds like they could do it ! Only problem is the lens , there are currently no lenses to fit a 3 x XM-L set up to fit a P60 ...

Hmm... So if a person based their triple around one of the LF 36mm mini turbo heads, it could likely be built with off-the-shelf parts? That might be the way to go.

Tony, which P60 host do you plan on using for this triple (if it is possible)?

I have a SolarForce L2P and I also want a triple XM-L, but plan on going a different route. I want to purchase the SolarForce MasterPiece Pro-2 head, and make a custom drop-in and use a reflector similar to the SkyRay 3800 or TrustFire 3xT6. The bigger MPP2 head should be able to handle the extra heat, and then you add a driver which could drive the LED's at 3A each and handle 1-2 or even 1-3 x 18650's.

If we can get enough people interested in this (I recon Foy would want one as well, hehe) maybe U_235 can machine the parts for us.

That would be awesome.

I have an L2P as well which is what I wanted to build a triple for. I've found that when I leave the house I always grab either my L2T, L2P, or M6 because of the convenient size. My larger lights (M8, MPP1, MPP2) end up sitting on the shelf. My motivation behind this is a triple that I wouldn't hesitate to grab as I'm walking out the door. Something that can ride comfortably clipped into a front pocket.

As for your idea, I've often wondered why SF hasn't built a MPP3. They could go crazy with the "3" theme. 3 XM-L, 3A per led off of 3 cells with a 3 mode driver. An easy way to approach that might be to start with a 3 XM-L drop-in from KD. I've got one on the way I was planning to use in a mag mod but I'll definitely check to see if it will fit the MPP2 head when it gets here.

I hear what you say and fully agree. A triple module upgrade for the L2P would be great. Each LED won't be driven at 3A, but it will still be brighter than 1 x XML. And then you can still have the ultimate 3 x XML in the MPP2 on the shelves for when the vampires attack :)