Ya, when I knew it might infringe Levis copyright, I wanted to buy it.
Not sure which parts of it assimilate Levis design though. looks like standard design of bags to me. I think Levis overdid this…
It could be anything on the bag, from the way the straps circle the bag to the type of stitching they use, or maybe even a direct design ripoff of a LS product. Levi Strauss has been around for 150+ years, and came up with the riveted demim back in 1871, and they hold tons of copyrights, trademarks and design patents. LS has been suing hundreds of Chinese manufacturers and distributors for IP theft, and it might be the only way to get to many of them through the financial system. It wouldn’t surprise me if LS got a court order to freeze his entire Paypal account until this is dealt with. They estimate a $200 billion dollar loss from counterfeits and IP theft each year in the US alone. No telling what it is world wide.
Seems a shame since I doubt Neal had any idea this simple bag could cause a problem. He may have to hire someone from the US, Europe, or both, that is fluent in the language to help sort this out.
I am not sure how they track to Neal. Could it be BLF GT getting so popular that attracted some copyright watchdog attentions? Or it is Neal’s other businesses already attracted their attentions.
I think it is unfair to small player if they don’t have the resource to check on copyright of design. This GT bag design seems to be so generic or common sense, but could be copyrighted by big companies.
Yeah, you never know. Could have been LS exact design from a few years ago. Could be Neal’s other businesses getting attention? maybe. A lot of large companies hire people to watch for counterfeits. Heck, the chinese are even stealing IP from the major car companies like Mercedes Benz, BMW, Jeep, Mazda, Mini Cooper, Range Rover, and even Rolls Royce. http://www.mycarconnector.com/20-shameless-chinese-knockoff-cars-that-are-basically-carbon-copies-of-the-originals/
Ya, some design are really shameless copy. Some just assimilate.
But for big company like Geely, I wonder those shameless copy is actually they got the permission from original company and rebadge to their brand.
Figured it could have been some outside business he was doing. But still, if Neal gave permission then it became Neal’s problem for selling fakes. Going to be hard to convince Levi Strauss’s lawyers that it wasn’t him, when the money was exchanging through his acct.