Phantastic light but double the LEDs and double the thermal dissipation loss of the D4 in an only marginally larger host. It's gonna be very very toasty.
Mule lights work very well for photo fill lighting, as Hank said. For example, the D18 can operate without optics, and illuminates an entire room very evenly. When pointed at a white ceiling, it makes a global illumination effect which pretty much eliminates shadows.
To reduce the amount of light needed, it can also work very well to bounce the light off something smaller and closer to the photo scene, like the inside of a white umbrella.
Thatās not fully true. Itās true w.r.t typical single emitter zoomies - but nothing prevents one from building a flood-centric zoomie with many emitters, the shelf space is there (not as large as with a mule but hey, these donāt use the whole available space anyway, I guess one could get even more with a zoomie despite the zooming mechanism taking space.
And stepdown would be even quicker. But not much, much, much quicker.
Very true. You could have a solid wall of emitters behind an aspheric lens. In flood mode have them all on for massive flood. Then in spot mode just have the center LED on for max throw.
But so far, nobody has built a zoomie that does that. For basically all zoomies you can buy nowā¦ an 8-emitter D4-sized mule will produce far more lumens at peak output than any similar sized zoomie that is currently available.