In these new lights the numbers are always inflated. When I bought my MF02 they stated 3000 lumens and 600+kCd. In reality more like 2100lm and 430kCd. Still an awesome light for the price.
Ok…all this “overstating” talk has me curious. I have an original run U-torch UT02, stock. Would it be safe to assume that the FT-03 will outperform it significantly? That’s my only goal. I’ll be honest, the UT02 does really well out to about 200 yards…maybe 250…but past that, it’s just “visible”.
I’m personally not going to concern myself too much if the FT03 can outperform that by a decent margin…for the price.