Is this pack recent? Label says it’s sold in Canada (zoom in on the image). Gotta say the charger (renamed to BQ-CC17KSBA) looks quite good in black. Though I think the package label is a bit misleading, because it says it accompanies AA batteries, despite the image showing AAAs.
I would if I already hadn’t got a (white) BQ-CC17, but thanks for the suggestion. This was HJK’s conclusion about the BQ-CC55 (Review of Charger Panasonic BQ-CC55)
I wonder if that is relevant only for older non-LSD Ni-MH batteries with raised internal resistence.
Nah, they’re indeed AAAs, this is how the charger looks filled with AAs:
I can not buy at amazon. Only ebay and others that accept paypal.
Sadly XP
And I already saw it on amazon… The price has increased in a few hours. It was 24.99 now 25.99… It seems that as more people buy… More demand… Higher price
I’m looking at buying the latest Eneloop Pro AA cells at Amazon - which I believe are in the package labeled in the upper right: “Capacity min. 2500 mAH.” However, there are quite a few recent reviews saying that the measured capacity of many of the cells received by those customers is between 1800 and 2000 mAH. Most reviews don’t mention this, and they rate the cells highly, but several do. Are these cases in which people didn’t go through several charge cycles with their new cells, and judged their capacity too early? Or, should I worry about getting defective Pro’s that perform more like the basic Eneloop AA’s?
Maybe I should try the PowerOwl cells - that claim 2800 mAH and seem to have virtually all positive reviews recently? Anyone have any guidance they can give me? It’s been awhile since I’ve bought Eneloops - I have a few Pro AA’s from a few years ago, but I have not measured their capacity. I think it’s time to do that….