They are place inside the holes of the aux pcb and mcpcb, where the optic’s leg would normally go, so it is easy to reassemble. Their length makes them almost flush tonthe surface so it’s easy to reassemble. I shaved mine just a tiny bit to make them equal and it was also easier to have the legs stay aligned to the holes for the first screw turn and I doubt it affected the beam.
If you got the 5000K or 5700K version your numbers look fine. It seems like you’re loosing around 200lm with every 1000K (4000-4500K ones score about 1400lm).
Hi everyone! It’s my first post here, been a lurker for years.
After almost four years I finally ordered my second Emisar in December, and am now going through the import process here in Finland. Even though Hank’s message above implies the IOSS scheme is applied to orders from only limited EU countries, I wonder if it could still be applied to other countries too… A question for EU users who have recently ordered from Intl-Outdoors:
Is there an IOSS code on the box/shipping label? If there is, would you like to share it either here or in a private message? I’d be interested in seeing if the code can be applied in my local customs form.
Thanks!
Edit: If this is too sensitive or off-topic subject, I can delete the message.
The Samsungs are all positive duv (green) despite their binning indicates they could be below the BBL. There’s never been a LH351D tested below the BBL unless it’s shaved. Flashlight manufacturers should just stop using the Samsungs and go with the new Nichia 519A if it turns out below the bbl.
Most of the 90CRI LH351Ds I’ve used have been only marginally above the BBL, and this not a real world issue. These emitters are a great compromise between output and CRI.