It uses 19 kHz PWM, which is invisible to about 99.99% of the population. Additionally, the medium levels pulse between ~150 lumens and ~1400 lumens without actually turning off, so it’s even harder to see.
Moon runs at 9 kHz instead (to make it more stable), so if you’re really sensitive to PWM you might see it on moon. Most people can’t see anything above 1 kHz though, so it’s still unlikely.
I tested a sample which I think was a 2-something tint, about halfway between cool white and neutral white, and I got about 1400 lumens. A better battery should get a bit more output. In any case, I’d estimate that a CW unit would probably get slightly higher lumens and a NW would probably get slightly lower lumens, but it depends on what emitter bins end up being used.
Whoooaaa. What a great way to make a 1500 post man….I didnot even realise it!
Posting a want post on a custom flashlight, custom driver on an epic thread :D. I’ve never been a custom group buy. Hope I can still be included. But being new here does not help my case
I have my lightbox calibrated pretty close to selfbuilt’s, so I can confirm that 0.30 lm on the BLF-A6 will be significantly more light than 0.04lm on the Ti3.
The first round of EE A6 samples was pretty good, but its moon performance was more varied than expected. One sample would get 0.10 lm while another got 0.50 lm with the same settings and same battery. And the off-time measurements varied depending on temperature. We’re trying to fix those things now.
Turbo step-down isn’t a user-toggle-able feature, but you’re welcome to modify the code and reflash the driver. However, the level it steps down to is what most other lights call “turbo”, so it’s basically like having no turbo step-down on a normal light plus an additional super-turbo mode.