It’s the highest performing LED I have out of the 5 I tested with the lens on…it’s the only one I took the lens off of…
The other 4 barely made 4800 to 5200lm at T/O then I got 358Kcd. But now out of the same exact light, battery and driver set-up it is now doing 408Kcd just swapped the board and LED out… proof enough for me…this is an actual reading the meter isn’t locked on to the highest burst…
The window is AR coated with likely 99% transmission
and the reflections are mostly shining back on the die, so they get recycled, so removing this glass would be a minimal change like 0.3%, not worth the risk
on your last picture there is already a speck of dust on the emitter that may burn in destroying the LED
Trying to measure this is not possible as its smaller than the usual measurement error, even with professional gear
Did you test this? The window is double AR coated (both sides are AR coated), and Dale got more out put removing the window on 2 of his builds…. I think I got a better performing SBT-90.2 and the others were for shit? I got one more left from Neal… and 2 more coming on 45mm boards…I caught the spec of crap on the LED, it is working fine, was playing with it all night long… I also had to open up the centering ring diameter to fit around the LED pad, I think before it was sitting on around the metal rim…kind of weird that everybody is testing 4700-5000lm and lower and this one out of 5 performs better…… I’m not selling this one…
Arnold in this topic tested his with AR window cold start almost 6k Lumens and his Lumens are pretty precise on all lights
I have worked with laser equipment a long time and the difference between an 99.98% mirror and 99% mirror
it is only with precise gear measurable if done in a measurement without changing the test setup in any way
and if you clean the 99.98% it will get worse than fresh out of the box
I bet those windows are made from precisely parallel glass, maybe not laser grade but enough not to distort the beam in a measurable amount
Just sticking the light a slightly different in the lumen tube can lead to different results
Yes, true…but I’m sticking by what I’m seeing in my own lumen tube…trusting Dales readings in gain, until somebody with the good measuring devices can actually test it too