Ive been using NiZn for many years, and for some applications theyâre great. Specifically high drain, low usage devices like an electric razor. With alkaline, the suggested, or nimh, the panasonic model my partner and I use is marginal. It doesnât cut all that well, and occasionally grabs. With the NiZn, it cuts really well, and rarely grabs. I havenât tried the lithium ion rechargeable, though looking at the power curves, it would probably be somewhere between alkaline or nimh, and NiZn, and probably OK. I also used to use a reach brand removable battery inexpensive toothbrush. it was pretty devent with NiZn, and not very good with other technologies.
As to battery longevity. I originally had 8 Powergenix cells, which are over 15 years old. One is still usable, though capacity is significantly lower than original, but it is still better in the shaver than alkaline or nimh. The first replacements are about 10 years old, are ultracell brand, 4 of 8 still working, and again still better in the shavers than standard alternatives, though they again drain significantly faster than new. Newest are EBL, 3ish years old, and the 4th one may have just died today. it came out of the original charger indicating charged, was put in a shaver, which barely operated, showed very low current when tested, faulted when put back in EBL charger, but seems to be charging OK in older urtracell charger. so status is unknown up to now. So batteries donât last as long as nimh, but in some applications, work much better. Making a so so shaver and toothbrush work mcuh better, as youâd suspect from the voltage at high amperage curve charts.
As to device longevity. The toothebrush and shavers have had zero issues using the higher voltage/currect of the NIZN batteris. One had to be replaced because it was dropped, but was used consistently for 10 years with NiZn with no problems. 2 others for 3 years. toothbrush is only used occasionally, but is just fine. Ive also used them in LED flashlights, and they are a little brighter, but theyâre not great for self discharge, so only good for times when youâre wanting slighly brighter for moderate amounts of time, and not for emergency when the lights go out flashlights. (so not a great trade off, not really recomendedâŚ) DONâT use them for old incandescent bulb flashlights. NiZn batteries burn out the bulbs in seconds.
So in my experience, for some applications, NiZn is distinctly superior. Specifically for high drain low to moderate duty cycle applications. None of the many articles Iâve seen have discussed this. Failure rate is higher, though some cells last for many years with lower amp hours, but still are better than mainstream alternatives for shorter periods of time. I think there is a significant chance that with more R&D, as has been applied to NiMh and Lithium Ion already, with significant improvements to the reliability of these technologies, NiZn could be a superior technology in some applications, with acceptable longevity.
I donât have a PKcell vs EBL comment. Iâm about to order some PKcell AAâs, as the EBLâs are starting to get questionable, but it will be 8 EBL aaâs vs 8 PKcellâs, and so not really a valid test.
Iâve also never seen any other reviewer comment on where NiZn can be superior to other technologies. Specifically high drain high power applications like a shaver or toothebrush. One article I looked at showed voltage at 3 amp drain, and all other technologies were almost immediately under 1.3 volt, with NiZn maintaining 1.5 volt plus for most of itâs curve, and 1.4 almost itâs entire curve. Thatâs a major advantage for some applications, and the author didnât even bother to include the technology in the watt hour charts at the end of the article. Just saying it wasnât popular earlier in the article. This is similar in almost every write up of the technology vs other more popular options, and seems pretty stupid and short sighted to me.