I JUST got a set of these…
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DQ513WVT/
…and they’re NOT 100W/10000lm, despite being marked on the bulb itself that way.
They only draw 45W and put out maybe 4000lm-4500lm if I had to guess.
I’m definitely gonna piss’n’moan to the mfr, see if they offer a “rebate” of sorts, else I’m gonna return them.
Same as these…
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BZSQ2L8Q/
which are supposed to be 150W equivalents. Wanted a super-bright bulb to stick under the patio. Idgaf about quality (flicker/CT/CRI) out there, and just wanted brute-force lumenage.
Nope. About exactly on-par with 60W equivs, drawing 7.1W. Grexed to the mfr, asking if maybe they sent the wrong bulbs, spelled out the details above. They just said sorry and refunded me the full price!
Same with those “100W equiv” Tsunkatse snowcone blubs in the 24pak. Same 60W equiv despite markings on the bulbs and boxes. “100W equiv”, 13W real, vs “60W equiv”, 7W real. Grexed, and got half back.
Common theme. Sellers put out mislabeled blubs and hope no one calls 'em out on it. Most people have no clue about power draw, lumens, etc., and just use 'em. But the mfr figures that the very few who DO call 'em out, get paid off just to stfu and go away, and they still come out ahead.
Wellp, gonna see what’s the deal with those huge bulbs I got, and what the mfr says. Imagine they don’t like returns any more than I do. Go through Amazon and they’ll insist on the return for you to get refunded, but go through the mfr, and the mfr is more likely to just pay you off to keep quiet.
Cave canem.