Yes… Of course… :+1:
BTW 303 looks fine to you?
Yes… Of course… :+1:
BTW 303 looks fine to you?
Fine. Start test from 3V and increase ;))
I picked new driver from the batch and I did removed 104 from driver… short 20AWG wires, carobronze spring bypassed, XPG2S428 DD inside with DTP MCPCB,
I can only do test via clamp meter and fully charged Samsung INR30Q
And I did discharge test up to 3.8Voltage of mentioned battery.
so from Battery 4.2 to 3.8Voltage state it draw from 3.2- 2.6A of current (I did not measured minutes but it took a while to drop maybe 10 minutes or so).
It did run much cooler without 104
Reverse polarity protection works… I am impatient to see if battery overdischarge protection will kick.
So it is bit better without 104
Is there anything more that I could do or mod?
The drive voltage to the FET may be set low such that it is not being fully turned ON so it acts like a variable resistor rather than a low resistance switch. That would explain the limited current that you have experienced.
Could this be the cause of lower current draw or or S6602 is just plain resistor?
No one ever dealt with S6602?