I was able to revive the cell. The light isnt as bright as it used to be wtf (afaicr) and it means that current draw is less!, and the zapper itself doesnt seem as "explosive" (BEFORE: mosquito? poof peng!!, NOW: mosquito? frizzle-frizzle!) any more. Some degradation of the gadget must have taken place. The aging of electronic parts? The aged cell cant provide high currents anymore? I dunno. And wtf cares. It was a very cheap product, had already provided tons of fun at that time, lasted for a year, and i expected it to be dead.
Finally i opened it (3 screws, nothing was glued, yay!):
(click to enlarge!)
With my DMM i measured +4.0V with the indicated probes. The black cell is light-weight, so i assume it's a 4.2V LiPo rechargeable cell (which is similar to a 4.2V LiIon cell in terms of charge algorithm). I would have tried to charge it with my WF-188 (( i dont own a hobby charger )) but since i dont know soldering techniques and have no crododile clamps i didnt modify anything.
The built quality (cheap plastic) and the circuit design and soldering is extremely poor (and questionable). Not a safe layout/design. I did the above picture to document the soldering points of the wires. If one day a wire comes off (please no short!!), i could try to solder it back on.
I am not sure if the design has an overcharge protection -- it should! the manufacturer cant assume that every user disconnects the racket after exact 2 hours (as suggested by the "manual").
It is very instructive to open the swatter in order to get a feeling for the low quality built and "appreciate" it. Now i really know that the inner is designed very poor, that it is powered with a 4.2V block-shaped cell (lemme call it "LiPo"), and the plastic is the cheapest plastic one could image. Let the swatter fall on any hard ground (or carpet), and the handle, which is a thin plastic frame, will break into several parts.
I love such swatters, they are really awesome (and never fail to impress friends, visitors, neighbors, barbecue parties, ..). I am VERY willing to buy a new one as long as the built quality is much better than mine, e.g. with a handle made of rubber and high built quality (PCB layout, soldering, safety, ..). I dont mind LiPo's or LiIon's in a swatter since i am a proud owner of Eneloops (AA with C or D-size adapters) and C9000. The typical swatter (amazon) uses C cells or D cells; no problem with Eneloop AA's. D cells are less powerful than LiPo's but it's easier (and safer) to control their charge status and remaining voltage.
As for now, i am happy: i've revived the cell, the swatter kills mosquitos.
Just thinking that if i ever drop it (and i wont let my neighbors play with it. They can play with my (much more expensive) flashlights (because flashlights are really robust compared with this 3$ cheapo swatter!) but not with my swatter :p) i will not hesitate a second to do research on a replacement (ebay, DX/DD/MF/KD, .. or amazon because of better packaging) and buy a higher quality one. (and i would keep the LiPo cell for charge/discharge experiments with my WF-188 ;) )
Maybe there is a swatter community (similar to the existence of flashlight communities CPF, BFL, TBS) on the inet, then you'll be shot of kreisler (and some senior members are looking forward to my byebye hehe) and i found my new hobby. Flashlights were my new hobby for past winter season (because cold and dark), swatters could then be my new hobby for upcoming spring summer autumn seasons.
8)
EDIT: freshly charged, the cell comes off at 4.233V
self discharge rate:
2012-03-27, 00:05a.m.: 4.233V
to be continued...