The cells have to work harder to power all the LEDs (to the same brightness as just 1)
Someone better at maths and electronics may correct me here.
The GT4 doesn’t throw quite as far as the GT70 and the GT94 doesn’t throw quite as far as the GT90. Versions with 8 LEDs should have similar or slightly lower throw than the ones with 4 LEDs.
I really like monster lumen flooders but if the light is going to be massive I want it to have a a lot of throw. I will be curious to see if the 8 xhp70.2s blur the line between popcan power and the gt94’s throw.
Matt Smit measured the GT4 32000 lumens at switch on and at 5 minutes he still measured over 25000 lumens… My GT4 measured close to 600Kcd at switch on. For this light I’ll say around 50 000 lumens with definitely over 500Kcd for same head size as GT4.
Freeme, yes please give us an update what the latest progress is on this light.
As mentioned from finges the XHP70.3 will also a good choice for this light.
Well this is certainly an interesting concept but it needs some work to make it semi “practical.” A fandle for a start, that’s a butt tonne of wattage to cool, in the same body as a GT4… But with twice as many LED’s. Plus using XHP70.2’s STILL. The XHP70.3 HI is here, use it! No tint shift, better throw and not much lumen loss. Who currently is making high power lights with XHP70.3’s? I don’t know of any, but there probably are some.
Lumintop, you can be a sort of trend setter here. Get some of the new .3 HI emitters and market it as the latest and greatest instead of defaulting to what EVERY high power light uses. We’ve got better alternatives, use them. Hell even a GT-FC40 version would be interesting, although going off the performance of my Acebeam X50 with those emitters, the size to performance ratio would be a bit out of whack with anything other than Cree’s XHP70’s. Hell even XHP50.3 HI’s would be a cool addition. Just my two cents