I kinda wonder if the screws on the driver side should be moved in a few thousands, this would allow for the lack of uniformity in the driver diameter and better engagement on the ground ring. I think the same could be applied to the star side as well. Shrinking the star side pocket a tiny bit would not hurt!
The screws on the driver side cannot be moved in any farther without reducing the driver pocket diameter, which is a pretty tight fit as is, generally. I could step it in if the user doesn’t mind doing a little more sanding of the driver OD. The star side pocket can be reduced a couple thousandths though. The design relies on components with fairly loose tolerances, (drivers and LED’s) so the fit can vary a bit. Best solution might be to tighten it up and require some sanding. Let us not underestimate the holding force of those screws though.
Got my s2+ heatsink in a while ago and just got done building it up. This heatsink has superb quality and finish to it. I was surprised how well the driver retaining screws fit in the heatsink. Very good thread tolerances for being in copper. Thanks! Hope to buy some more products from you in the future.
Yeah. I just got around to building an eagle eye X6 and these spacers don’t fit.
The inner head diameter of the EE X6 is 31.61mm whereas these heat sinks are 29.88mm.
The diameter of the EE mcpcb inset is 21.31mm whereas these heat sinks are 18.02mm.
I was busy with other mods when I got these and never thought to check.
The size of the BLF X6 (both versions ) MCPCB inset is 20,9 mm, and the inner head diameter of the BLF X6 is 31,6mm. So not a good fit for the BLF X6 either.
Next will be the batch of ~30 retaining ring triple heatsinks. The screw style heatsinks will be seeing a return, with more screws and slightly tighter pockets.