Intl-Outdoor's "Copper" XM-L MCPCB

Thought I’d just give you guys a heads up. I ordered three of the XM-L U2 emitters on 16mm copper MCPCBs (w/ brass cap) from Intl-outdoor (link) in early June, received them a few weeks back. I realized that what I received was different from the pictures on their website, in fact the MCPCBs I got seemed like FR4 boards with thermal vias.

What I thought I was getting:



What I got:

So I sent an email today to Hank asking about it and this was the reply I just received:

_

Hi, Moses:

Please be advised that what you received are the latest “U2 1A 16mm Copper MCPCB”,

(in the attached), the heat resistance is close to zero.

The one on our website is the old version which will be updated today.

The old type can get rusty after some time.

Sorry didn’t let you be aware of it in advance.

Regards!

Hank

_

I doubt the heat resistance for the new PCB is “close to zero” and I was looking forward to real copper MCPCBs, but I’m going to let this one slide since Hank’s been good so far.

So are you saying that these MCPCB’s are not made of copper? Looking at the last picture sure seems like they are made out of aluminum

Well the ones I received and I guess the ones that Intl-outdoor’s been shipping since June are not copper. They are definitely not aluminum either, it’s most likely FR-4, which is the same stuff driver PCBs are made from (FR-4 wiki).

I’m no expert on this by any means, but from what I’ve read on FR-4 and thermal vias applications so far, they seem like a more cost-effective route than “full” metal core PCBs - from a materials standpoint that is. Cree provides FR-4 PCB design suggestions in their Optimizing PCB Thermal Performance application notes.

Ok, reading the Cree.com application notes I found this

“For a 1.6-mm thick star board approximately 270 mm2, the calculated through-plane thermal resistance is approximately
30 ºC/W.”

Since copper has a thermal conductivity of 398 ºC/W and aluminum 237 ºC/W these would be better than FR-4 that has only 30 ºC/W.

So it costs more but transmits less heat away from the die? It doesn’t make sense

30 ºC/W is for an FR-4 board without thermal vias, it should be way higher than that with thermal vias, but still lower than the thermal conductivity of copper or aluminum.

So is the Int'l Outdoor offering worth it verses "standard" stars? How much better are they?

-Garry

Worse.

Rusty boards?sounds like a shady supplier,I, glad to find out about this before I ordered some of these.True copper boards would be great but seems here another fail unfortunately.

If they were previously copper boards, Hank might’ve meant “oxidized” instead of “rust”.

The only place to get copper MCPCBs right now is still led-tech.de.

I was just going to ask that. Someone needs to pick up the ball and carry these!

-Garry

I just hate when I don’t receive what I saw on the description pictures and ordered…

http://www.dealextreme.com/p/cree-xm-l-18mm-aluminum-base-5-piece-pack-126699

Haven’t tried them but they look good…

I did get the old version board and it did have a bit of oxidation on it, not too bad though. Looks like I will be avoiding these in the future though.

The thin black one is from DX and the fat black is from Led-tech, don’t remember where I got the white star.
I don’t appreciate their customer service as they don’t reply on messages but their shop works flawless.


Ok, but they require reflowing. I'm not ready to do that. Looking for the emitter already mounted on a copper star.

Does Led-tech ship to the US? I think shipping kills the deal from them for me.

-Garry

Watch out for the material thickness as well. Many of the copper sinks I have seen are thinner material than comparably sized Aluminum. Its not that big of a deal, unless your host design requires the LED heatsink to push the reflector up against the bezel or window glass area.

Another member recently modded his HD2010 with (thinner) copper heatsink and his reflector ended up rattling lose inside the light.

So true.
Thickness is a big deal.

Look at this presentation by Bergquist on cooling of leds: (page 19)

So what I make of it: mass helps in transporting the heat -> better heatsinking if it has exposure to ambient air.

The heat of the led at first travels down from the die, just down, not omnidirectional. But from the contactarea of the led to star the heat spreads wider and wider, making it easier to the heatsink to transport the heat away with as less temperature rise as physics allow.
So mass counts (cross area of thermal conductive material), for a star, for the heatsink, for the body, helps cooling the led.

They do.

http://www.led-tech.de/en/index.html

Usually for 8,90€ -> about 11$. If you contact customer service, you can get almost any LED on almost any kind of star. But I think they have copper stars only for XML..