But why? 3A is quite fine for this flashlight. The Ti version doesnât pull any more. It seems to me steps backwards. I understand everyone wants a lot of power in a small package, but it doesnât make sense if itâs only available for a few seconds. In this case, less = better. I hope that I am not the only one who thinks so and it will not be changed.
Plus, it works great with the 219B.
I agree. 3A constant current means an already hot flashlight, especially with specific LEDâs. I would much rather have a way to limit or manage turbo current for longer turbo runs. If it could be user adjustable to suit specific LED setups or turbo runtime management it would be fantastic.
Would it be reasonably possible to replace TPS63020 with something similar that would offer higher output range? F.e. I donât know if it would be any good but I see TPS552882-Q1 that is only 2mm² larger and offers much higher in/out voltage range. As well as much higher currents.
Itâs less integrated, requires a few more passive and 2 external N channel mosfet for the buck leg, for example a dual N channel 3.3x3.3mm mosfet.
Last time I looked at this IC I tried using Webench and it doensât want to design the circuit with 1S li-ion voltage so maybe I missed something in the datasheet.