Im very impressed with this light. The construction is solid, the pill is metal, disassembly is easy, but unnecessary. Because imo the stock High CRI LED is very good. No need to modify. The stock lens is also good.
I consider the High CRI Skilhunt e3a a superior option to the Low CRI Olight i3e
I like using an old Eneloop (with high internal resistance), on these little twisties… I dont need 80-100 lumens… for me 20-30 lumens is more than enough for close range…
I’m with you there, 30 lumens is a good value for a lower mode, but a high is also nice to have…
I think it was you who posted a link to changing the sense resistor to lower the output? I’m tempted to pick one of these up and give it a go, perhaps if I see them on aliX with a good deal.
You’re right about the lack of thread slop, in my opinion Skilhunt did a fantastic job on the threads.
I did collect info on sense resistor change for the Olight, thanks to info shared by another member who had Skylumen do a modded Olight for him with High CRI LED and lower output.
Really is a no nonsense light this one. I’m fine with one mode, no faffing about, nothing to go wrong. Sometimes I notice it looks a little dim and drop another IKEA Ladda in it.
Been using mine for 3 years now, on my keychain. Personally I don’t think 100 lumens is necessary for such a light. I’d be happy with 30-50 lumens for the use cases I need it for . But other than that it has been stellar.
Hi all,
I have bought several High CRI E3a in the past, always very satisfied with them.
I gave a few ones as gifts, and kept two for myself.
I’ve just found out that they do not work if I feed them with Varta Power 1000 mAh. I mean: they don’t light up at all.
The same batteries work flawlessly in other AAA flashlights (e.g. DQG) and other devices.
My E3a work fine using Eneloop 800 mAh batteries, primary AAA, and primary lithium.
I have tested the internal resistance of my Varta Power 1000 mAh : slightly higher than my Eneloops, but still acceptable (around 100 mOhm vs 50), therefore it doesn’t explain their not operating my E3a.
Any clue Re. this strange behaviour?
Thanks in advance for your help.
I’d guess either length of the cell prevents the head from contacting the body, or it’s the reverse polarity protection.
Going from memory, I think the E3A has physical reverse polarity protection (shoulders either side of the positive battery contact to ensure the flat negative side of the cell can’t make connection).
I’d assume the nipple on the Varta’s is insufficiently proud of the body to make contact with the driver.
Thanks gravelmonkey for your quickreply and assumptions.
I have therefore measured the different batteries’ exact dimensions.
Here they are in mm, shown as “Battery model / Body length to “shoulders” / Body length including nipple” / nipple “height”
Varta / 43 / 44.4 / 1.4
Eneloop / 42.7 / 44.2 / 1.5
Duracell primary / 43 / 44.2 / 1.2
Energizer primary Li / 43 / 44.2 / 1.2
Do these measurements match your assumptions?
good measuring info
it shows the Varta are 0.2mm longer
Apparently that small extra length is preventing the light from closing far enough for the body tube to make contact with the driver.
the solution would be to make a ring with bare wire, 0.2mm thick, and put it in the head, around the plastic clip that holds the driver. Pushing the wire into the gap of the body around that plastic clip.
I have not tried this and I think it is a bad idea, because the wire might touch something it should not and cause a short circuit and ruin the driver.
here you can see the contact for the body on the driver. note there are many other expose solder joints that the wire could short to.