People bumping old threads

I thought we just read what we wanted and when something triggered a question or response we posted, I never thought that it made any difference how old the thread was.

2 Thanks

I feel like you just have a vendetta against me, which is weird because I don’t actually even remember any interactions except for that one thread where I suggested your comment might be an overreaction. If you really took that much offence at that, that makes you sound a lot more ā€˜triggered’ than me.

Bumping old threads doesn’t upset me, it’s just something that is discouraged on many forums, and that I personally can occasionally find mildly confusing (but am also fine working with if it’s considered fine to). If there’s a consensus that it’s preferred over new threads I’m completely fine with that, just felt like having the discussion, particularly since Discourse does tend to make it easier to accidentally not notice the age of a thread…

2 Thanks

Contributing to or commenting on an old thread is not the same as merely saying ā€œbump.ā€

Old threads are as good and relevant as any, depending on what you are doing at the moment. Any substantive contribution to this forum is welcome.

2 Thanks

Never advocated for entirely preventing it… Just when someone does something like reply to a 3 year old WTS thread, it’s probably accidental. Probably also the reason /r/flashlight has a monthly BST thread instead of a BST megathread.

Hello there! I am not an active user of this forum (literally I have only one thread) and this question makes me wonder if not mine topic triggered those thoughts))) I think not but I can agree that similar off-topics which can contain some not forum theme-related things can be undesirable for some old forum users.
Anyway, I hate Reddit because you can’t ask a question in older locked threads which leads to creating new threads for really simple or stupid questions. IMO bigger mega threads with some type of ā€œtable of contentā€ (which kind regular forum users are creating eventually) are much better. And more friendly to new users, because you just can ask a question in thread instead of creating new (which will replace bumping old threads). And on different forums, I never was annoyed by bumped old threads and never understood bans for that.
Maybe creating a poll could better show if old threads are an issue? It’s always easier to participate in a poll than in conversation.

I’ll add my 2c

Prior to the change over to discourse blf had necro threads. Generally speaking it doesn’t bother me.
Sometimes I like it when new , more updated information / products are added to an old discussion.

Other times i wonder what that poster is doing by raising that thread. I guess this is the type of necro that you’re talking about here when you say ā€œaccidentalā€ revival. Meh, some people shouldn’t have a car license but y’know… accidents happen :upside_down_face:

3 Thanks

Don’t take it personally, I’ve accidentally bumped old threads myself - in your case then perhaps it was understandable, maybe just me assuming ā€œeveryone knows the current charger recommendationsā€ā€¦ which I now feel, fair enough there :stuck_out_tongue:

2 Thanks

My 2c: Maybe because I am used to this forum. but I personally think that the ability to resurface old threads is a great feature. I actually love it. That’s something I really dislike about Reddit for example, where the focus is only on new threads. new threads… new threads… resulting in shallow threads, shallow discussions… Only people who get replied to might notice the thread in their inbox. It will never get to the top of the list.
Candlepowerfurms locks threads after certain time… so you can’t even edit a comment, which also sucks. I have threads (like the: your favorite flashlight of 2023 etc, or my Eneloop thread) that I can’t edit … even after only a few days have passed… So the only way to update something is to reach out to a mod, who has to unlock the thread/post. That’s annoying in my opinion.

I like that SB has added some messages where a post hasn’t been replied to for a while… that’s pretty helpful I guess… This can also be seen when somebody comments, who hasn’t been posting for a while.

7 Thanks

That someone in a public forum has an opinion that differs from mine would only be unbelievable to me if I believed that everyone was obligated to or inclined by nature to agree with me about everything. Even if that were the case, which it is not, I wouldn’t assume their opinion was the result of being ā€œtriggeredā€ when they had explained their opinion calmly and rationally, as was the case in this instance.

5 Thanks

You can always tell when things/topics get a little bit slow around here…

2 Thanks

Thats different. If the thread has been going the whole time it’s not necroposting, the post wasn’t dead.

3 Thanks

It makes it more interesting if it was dead for 10 years, that means it is still relevant, the context is still valid.

2 Thanks

I think bumping old threads is fine - it makes sense that all questions and comments about a particular light are in one thread. Some forums only allow one thread per product and lock all the others and I can see the value in that - I think it’s much better than the current system here where 10 members all create their own review thread for the same light with 10 separate discussions following.

2 Thanks

Got no problem with anyone Necro bumping ANY Oldlumens threads, his stuff was/is still relevant today.

Yeah, a ā€œIs that flashlight still availableā€ from a 3 year old thread on something that was well priced is annoying but it is bound to happen.
Bottom line ā€œRead what you likeā€ and the rest is just …Water off a ducks back.
Besides the traffic helps our owner, so rock it kids :slight_smile:

1 Thank

Bumping or rehashing old threads is, to me, almost always welcome. I cannot say the same for some of the new threads. Keep on reviving old threads and I will keep on checking on them.

Micro managing others behaviors is borderline narcissistic. JSRN right now.

4 Thanks

I don’t have a problem with replying to old threads, sometimes the information is still relevant and the new post adds to that. It used to annoy me when someone would post an answer to a question that someone asked years ago and the original poster’s probably no longer even a member but, someone else might have the same question.

Sometimes the new reply doesn’t add anything useful but that’s not a feature unique to new threads.

3 Thanks

Jewish Senior Recreation Network?

4 Thanks

I was scratching my head at that one as well :sweat_smile: :thinking: :face_in_clouds:

3 Thanks

My daughter says it all the time JSRN Dad. Just Saying Right Now. I add another right now to the end of it to aggravate her. It’s just kinda stuck with me I guess.

1 Thank