The difference could be attributed to several factors/variables:
- Light measurement Setup: For yours truly, I use a home-made light-box setup that I calibrated to several reference lights, so there will be variant in the measurement.
- Test Environment: Temperature plays an important part in these measurement. It impacts both the brightness and runtime.
- LED/Driver: Variance in LED batch and/or Driver during manufacturing and assembling process. Most mass manufacturers do not calibrate/fine-tuned the output like those from HDS Systems and some custom makers. Sometimes, a change in a tiny component due to sourcing issue could have great impact on how the light performs.
- The manufacturer took the lowest common denominator in their test result to publish.
- The manufacturer use Calculated figures. This is especially apparent in the lower brightness runtime.
- Miscommunications between R&D or Engineering Department and the folks at Marketing and/or Sales Department.
- etc.
There are also instances that the manufacturer over-quoted their numbers and corrected in a later revision and/or printing... it's a heavy heartache experience trying to convince the Engineer to correctly interpret the parameters in ANSI/NEMA FL-1 or ANSI/PLATO FL-1.